From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/32] Introduce HVM without dm and new boot ABI Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:46:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1444304811.1410.167.camel@citrix.com> References: <1443800943-17668-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk9fI-0004q0-GM for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:47:16 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1443800943-17668-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Roger Pau Monne , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 17:48 +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > This series is split in the following order: > > - Patches from 2 to 11 switch HVM domain contruction to use the xc_dom_* > family of functions, like they are used to build PV domains. This batch > of patches can go in regardless of the status of the rest of the series > IMHO, and in fact would help me quite a lot with the rebasing. Applied this chunk, including the v8 of #5. > - Patches from 25 to 32 introduce the creation of HVM guests without a > device model and without the devices emulated inside of Xen. >>From this I applied "xenconsole: try to attach to PV console if HVM fails". Ian.