From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] xen: sched: better handle (not)
 inserting idle vCPUs in runqueues
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:39:02 +0200
Message-ID: <1444318742.22254.32.camel@citrix.com>
References: <20151008124027.12522.42552.stgit@Solace.station>
	<20151008125251.12522.3916.stgit@Solace.station>
	<56168B50.6010800@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3164165416868158488=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <prvs=716e2e2ab=dario.faggioli@citrix.com>)
	id 1ZkDHf-00012U-UJ
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 15:39:08 +0000
In-Reply-To: <56168B50.6010800@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============3164165416868158488==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-I19wVbRHt2cF8hcpR4AQ"

--=-I19wVbRHt2cF8hcpR4AQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 16:27 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/10/15 13:52, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > [...]
> > The check for whether we'd be inserting an idle vCPU
> > in a queue, now, happens, once and for all schedulers,
> > in generic code, at vCPU initialization time, while
> > we can just avoid trying (and always failing!) doing
> > so when doing cpupools manipulations.
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
>=20
> Although it might be easier to evaluate the previous patch if this
> one
> were moved behind it in the series:
>=20
Indeed. I only did it like this because, in case we want to backport
patch 1 and 2, we would not need to backport this one (which is more an
improvement than a bugfix) too.

> Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
>=20
Thanks. :-)

Regards,
Dario
--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-I19wVbRHt2cF8hcpR4AQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEABECAAYFAlYWjhYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTQBgCcC8OzRRJQhrBhlBqN95npI/Jw
dIEAnRA9ltkyO1Y/ovxjt3QXRsecTBbu
=TetS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-I19wVbRHt2cF8hcpR4AQ--


--===============3164165416868158488==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============3164165416868158488==--