From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] xen/arm: vgic: Optimize the way to
 store the target vCPU in the rank
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:38:09 +0100
Message-ID: <1444390689.1410.353.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1444228871-383-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
	<1444228871-383-8-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1510071821100.1179@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<56156161.4090109@citrix.com> <1444301795.1410.148.camel@citrix.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1510081220190.1179@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<1444307021.1410.170.camel@citrix.com> <561673A8.8050608@citrix.com>
	<1444314312.1410.206.camel@citrix.com> <5616B7C1.8070503@citrix.com>
	<5617A3F9.70906@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <prvs=717dc9c5a=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>)
	id 1ZkW05-0001Ce-DU
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 11:38:13 +0000
In-Reply-To: <5617A3F9.70906@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 12:24 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:

> I plan to fix it in patch #1 and request a backport for Xen 4.6 and Xen
> 4.5. I can do a separate patch if we don't want the cleanup.

I'm not quite sure what you are proposing but please put logical changes
and cleanups into separate patches and we will evaluate them for backport
individually (taking dependencies into account too).

Ian.