From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH v14 PART 2 10-26/26] Nested HVM testing Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:54:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1444640084.1410.445.camel@citrix.com> References: <1443181028-22705-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> <1443208522-24905-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> <9E79D1C9A97CFD4097BCE431828FDD31F3E402@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlYsb-0006IO-80 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:54:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <9E79D1C9A97CFD4097BCE431828FDD31F3E402@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Hu, Robert" , Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 03:35 +0000, Hu, Robert wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com] > > Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 3:15 AM > > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > > Cc: Hu, Robert ; Ian Campbell > > ; Ian Jackson > > Subject: [OSSTEST PATCH v14 PART 2 10-26/26] Nested HVM testing > > > > This is the second part of v14 Robert Ho's osstest patch series to > > support nested HVM tests. > > > > It is also available here: > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/iwj/xen.git > > http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/people/iwj/xen.git > > in wip.nested-hvm.v14.part1..wip.nested-hvm.v14 > > > > Compared to Robert's v13, which was passed to me by private email, > > * I have rebased onto current osstest pretest; > > * I have changed how selecthost() is told it's dealing with > > a nested host (in practice, L1 guest); > > * There are a large number of minor cleanups; > > * There are some new preparatory cleanup and admin patches; > > * I have rewritten almost all of the commit messages. > > > > However, I have done only VERY LIMITED testing. Much of the code here > > is UNTESTED since my changes. My testing was confined to: > > * Verifying that my changes to cs-adjust-flight worked > > * Checking that ad-hoc runs of ts-host-reboot and ts-host-powercycle > > seemed to work when a guest was specified on the command line. > > > > Robert, you kindly volunteered to test a revised version of this > > series. I would appreciate if you would check that all of this still > > works as you expect. I expect there will be some bugs, perhaps even > > very silly bugs, introduced by me. > Sure. > Am I supposed to test Part 1 together with this Part 2? or each > individually? > How's Part 1's status now? pass pretest and in production branch? or > still > need test? AFAIK Part 1 is in production already. (For a little while, I think). Ian.