From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v3 3/3] Create a flight to test
 OpenStack with xen-unstable and libvirt
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:39:50 +0100
Message-ID: <1444736390.23192.54.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1443455775-26131-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com>
	<1443455775-26131-4-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com>
	<22026.49585.770165.194074@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<1444320537.1410.259.camel@citrix.com>
	<22038.40208.312461.269420@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<20151009105452.GB1838@perard.uk.xensource.com>
	<22044.58567.627001.346336@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <22044.58567.627001.346336@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:02 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Anthony PERARD writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v3 3/3] Create a flight to
> test OpenStack with xen-unstable and libvirt"):
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 05:42:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > If we do want to just ignore this issue of the other trees, I do
> > > indeed see no particular reason to explicitly set all the runvars to
> > > master.
> > > 
> > > > I think we want a push gate just for the regression tracking, but
> > > > not
> > > > really for its own sake.
> > 
> > Yes, that is what I had in mind, testing OpenStack with tips of xen and
> > libvirt.
> > > 
> > > In that case we I think yes don't really need to push multiple
> > > branches.
> > 
> > I'll remove all those revision_* runvars.
> 
> Do you mean to remove the settings of them all to `master', or the
> code to honour them ?
> 
> The machinery in the ts-* script to honour revision_xyz and to set
> built_revision_xyz is useful because the bisector can use it to finger
> individual tress.

That all comes for free via build_clone I think, IOW Anthony would need to
go a good deal out of his way to not honour them I think.

> Unless, of course, you don't want to run the bisector on these tests.

I don't think we should rule it out.

Ian.