From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 3/7] libxl: add pvusb API Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:30:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1444743036.23192.87.camel@citrix.com> References: <1443147102-6471-1-git-send-email-cyliu@suse.com> <1443147102-6471-4-git-send-email-cyliu@suse.com> <560C2204.9030707@citrix.com> <561BCF8B0200006600072938@relay2.provo.novell.com> <561BB9A6.10100@citrix.com> <561C6264.6090507@novell.com> <561D03F4.5020901@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <561D03F4.5020901@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap , Chun Yan Liu , Chun Yan Liu , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Juergen Gross , wei.liu2@citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, Jim Fehlig , Simon Cao List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 14:15 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > In the absence of guidance to the contrary, I suggest that patch series > should focus on getting the core pvusb functionality in, without the > extra usb-querying bits. Then we can discuss a further series which > either adds the usb querying functionality to libxl, or implement it in > xl using libusb. That would seem sensible to me. Lets get the (hopefully) uncontroversial core functionality done and then worry about any extras etc, since they seem to be preventing us from making forward progress at the moment. Ian.