* [PATCH v2] xen,arm: enable cpu_hotplug
@ 2015-10-16 16:33 Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] xen/arm: Enable cpu_hotplug.c Stefano Stabellini
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2015-10-16 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Stefano Stabellini
Hi all,
this small patch series enable cpu_hotplug in ARM and ARM64 guests,
using the PV path to plug and unplug the cpus and psci to enable/disable
them.
Stefano Stabellini (3):
xen/arm: Enable cpu_hotplug.c
xen, cpu_hotplug: call device_offline instead of cpu_down
xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug.
arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 10 ++++++++++
arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 10 ++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 5 +++++
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
drivers/xen/Makefile | 2 --
drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c | 11 ++++++++---
6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Cheers,
Stefano
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/3] xen/arm: Enable cpu_hotplug.c
2015-10-16 16:33 [PATCH v2] xen,arm: enable cpu_hotplug Stefano Stabellini
@ 2015-10-16 16:34 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:40 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-16 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] xen, cpu_hotplug: call device_offline instead of cpu_down Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug Stefano Stabellini
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2015-10-16 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Stefano Stabellini
Build cpu_hotplug for ARM and ARM64 guests.
Rename arch_(un)register_cpu to xen_(un)register_cpu and provide an
empty implementation on ARM and ARM64. On x86 just call
arch_(un)register_cpu as we are already doing.
Initialize cpu_hotplug on ARM.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- don't initialize if not a xen_domain() on arm
- protect xen_arch_(un)register_cpu with ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on arm
---
arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 10 ++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 5 +++++
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
drivers/xen/Makefile | 2 --
drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c | 8 ++++++--
5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
index 04ff8e7..9525151 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
@@ -26,4 +26,14 @@ void __init xen_early_init(void);
static inline void xen_early_init(void) { return; }
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+static inline void xen_arch_register_cpu(int num)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void xen_arch_unregister_cpu(int num)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
#endif /* _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERVISOR_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
index d866959..8b2d4be 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
@@ -57,4 +57,9 @@ static inline bool xen_x2apic_para_available(void)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+void xen_arch_register_cpu(int num);
+void xen_arch_unregister_cpu(int num);
+#endif
+
#endif /* _ASM_X86_XEN_HYPERVISOR_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index 11d6fb4..ba62d8e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
#include <asm/mwait.h>
#include <asm/pci_x86.h>
#include <asm/pat.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
#include <linux/acpi.h>
@@ -1868,3 +1869,17 @@ const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_xen = {
.set_cpu_features = xen_set_cpu_features,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_hyper_xen);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+void xen_arch_register_cpu(int num)
+{
+ arch_register_cpu(num);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xen_arch_register_cpu);
+
+void xen_arch_unregister_cpu(int num)
+{
+ arch_unregister_cpu(num);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xen_arch_unregister_cpu);
+#endif
diff --git a/drivers/xen/Makefile b/drivers/xen/Makefile
index e293bc5..aa8a7f7 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/xen/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
-ifeq ($(filter y, $(CONFIG_ARM) $(CONFIG_ARM64)),)
obj-$(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) += cpu_hotplug.o
-endif
obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += fallback.o
obj-y += grant-table.o features.o balloon.o manage.o preempt.o
obj-y += events/
diff --git a/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c b/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
index cc6513a..43de1f5 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
static void enable_hotplug_cpu(int cpu)
{
if (!cpu_present(cpu))
- arch_register_cpu(cpu);
+ xen_arch_register_cpu(cpu);
set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
}
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static void enable_hotplug_cpu(int cpu)
static void disable_hotplug_cpu(int cpu)
{
if (cpu_present(cpu))
- arch_unregister_cpu(cpu);
+ xen_arch_unregister_cpu(cpu);
set_cpu_present(cpu, false);
}
@@ -102,7 +102,11 @@ static int __init setup_vcpu_hotplug_event(void)
static struct notifier_block xsn_cpu = {
.notifier_call = setup_cpu_watcher };
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
if (!xen_pv_domain())
+#else
+ if (!xen_domain())
+#endif
return -ENODEV;
register_xenstore_notifier(&xsn_cpu);
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/3] xen, cpu_hotplug: call device_offline instead of cpu_down
2015-10-16 16:33 [PATCH v2] xen,arm: enable cpu_hotplug Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] xen/arm: Enable cpu_hotplug.c Stefano Stabellini
@ 2015-10-16 16:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug Stefano Stabellini
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2015-10-16 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Stefano Stabellini
When offlining a cpu, instead of cpu_down, call device_offline, which
also takes care of updating the cpu.dev.offline field. This keeps the
sysfs file /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/online, up to date. Also move
the call to disable_hotplug_cpu, because it makes more sense to have it
there.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
---
drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c b/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
index 43de1f5..78804b5 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ static void enable_hotplug_cpu(int cpu)
static void disable_hotplug_cpu(int cpu)
{
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ device_offline(get_cpu_device(cpu));
if (cpu_present(cpu))
xen_arch_unregister_cpu(cpu);
@@ -55,7 +57,6 @@ static void vcpu_hotplug(unsigned int cpu)
enable_hotplug_cpu(cpu);
break;
case 0:
- (void)cpu_down(cpu);
disable_hotplug_cpu(cpu);
break;
default:
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug.
2015-10-16 16:33 [PATCH v2] xen,arm: enable cpu_hotplug Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] xen/arm: Enable cpu_hotplug.c Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] xen, cpu_hotplug: call device_offline instead of cpu_down Stefano Stabellini
@ 2015-10-16 16:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:49 ` Julien Grall
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2015-10-16 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Stefano Stabellini
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
---
arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
index 6c09cc4..b193811 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -93,6 +93,16 @@ static void xen_percpu_init(void)
int err;
int cpu = get_cpu();
+ /*
+ * VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info cannot be called twice for the same
+ * vcpu, so if vcpu_info is already registered, just get out. This
+ * can happen with cpu-hotplug.
+ */
+ if (per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) != NULL) {
+ put_cpu();
+ return;
+ }
+
pr_info("Xen: initializing cpu%d\n", cpu);
vcpup = per_cpu_ptr(xen_vcpu_info, cpu);
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xen/arm: Enable cpu_hotplug.c
2015-10-16 16:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] xen/arm: Enable cpu_hotplug.c Stefano Stabellini
@ 2015-10-16 16:40 ` Julien Grall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julien Grall @ 2015-10-16 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Stefano,
On 16/10/15 17:34, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Build cpu_hotplug for ARM and ARM64 guests.
>
> Rename arch_(un)register_cpu to xen_(un)register_cpu and provide an
> empty implementation on ARM and ARM64. On x86 just call
> arch_(un)register_cpu as we are already doing.
>
> Initialize cpu_hotplug on ARM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug.
2015-10-16 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug Stefano Stabellini
@ 2015-10-16 16:49 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-19 10:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julien Grall @ 2015-10-16 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Stefano,
On 16/10/15 17:35, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> index 6c09cc4..b193811 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,16 @@ static void xen_percpu_init(void)
> int err;
> int cpu = get_cpu();
>
> + /*
> + * VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info cannot be called twice for the same
> + * vcpu, so if vcpu_info is already registered, just get out. This
> + * can happen with cpu-hotplug.
> + */
> + if (per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) != NULL) {
> + put_cpu();
> + return;
> + }
Not really related to this patch. By side effect this patch is also not
calling irq_percpu_enable.
Looking around, all the caller of irq_percpu_enable will call
irq_percpu_disable when the CPU is dying. Is there any side effect to
not doing this?
Regards,
> +
> pr_info("Xen: initializing cpu%d\n", cpu);
> vcpup = per_cpu_ptr(xen_vcpu_info, cpu);
>
>
--
Julien Grall
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug.
2015-10-16 16:49 ` Julien Grall
@ 2015-10-19 10:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-19 10:27 ` Julien Grall
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2015-10-19 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julien Grall; +Cc: xen-devel, linux-arm-kernel, Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 16/10/15 17:35, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > index 6c09cc4..b193811 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > @@ -93,6 +93,16 @@ static void xen_percpu_init(void)
> > int err;
> > int cpu = get_cpu();
> >
> > + /*
> > + * VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info cannot be called twice for the same
> > + * vcpu, so if vcpu_info is already registered, just get out. This
> > + * can happen with cpu-hotplug.
> > + */
> > + if (per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) != NULL) {
> > + put_cpu();
> > + return;
> > + }
>
>
> Not really related to this patch. By side effect this patch is also not
> calling irq_percpu_enable.
>
> Looking around, all the caller of irq_percpu_enable will call
> irq_percpu_disable when the CPU is dying. Is there any side effect to
> not doing this?
Given that Xen won't inject any event irqs when a cpu is offline, I
don't think there are any side effects.
> > +
> > pr_info("Xen: initializing cpu%d\n", cpu);
> > vcpup = per_cpu_ptr(xen_vcpu_info, cpu);
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Julien Grall
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug.
2015-10-19 10:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
@ 2015-10-19 10:27 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-19 16:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julien Grall @ 2015-10-19 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefano Stabellini; +Cc: xen-devel, linux-arm-kernel
On 19/10/15 11:10, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> On 16/10/15 17:35, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>>> index 6c09cc4..b193811 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>>> @@ -93,6 +93,16 @@ static void xen_percpu_init(void)
>>> int err;
>>> int cpu = get_cpu();
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info cannot be called twice for the same
>>> + * vcpu, so if vcpu_info is already registered, just get out. This
>>> + * can happen with cpu-hotplug.
>>> + */
>>> + if (per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) != NULL) {
>>> + put_cpu();
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>
>>
>> Not really related to this patch. By side effect this patch is also not
>> calling irq_percpu_enable.
>>
>> Looking around, all the caller of irq_percpu_enable will call
>> irq_percpu_disable when the CPU is dying. Is there any side effect to
>> not doing this?
>
> Given that Xen won't inject any event irqs when a cpu is offline, I
> don't think there are any side effects.
I'm not talking about the behavior of Xen when the vCPU is down but any
side effect in Linux (i.e not re-enabling the IRQ or else).
All the other user of percpu IRQ is doing the call so there must be a
reason to do it.
Looking more closely to the code, the GIC driver will reset the vCPU
interface every time the vCPU is coming back online (see
gic_secondary_init).
Resetting the vCPU interface means all the PPIs will be disabled (see
gic_cpu_config). As the event channel IRQ is a PPI it won't be
re-enabled and the vCPU will never receive event channel.
So you have to re-enable this interrupt unconditionally. At the same
time, I'd like to see the irq_percpu_disable to match irq_percpu_enable
as the other users do.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug.
2015-10-19 10:27 ` Julien Grall
@ 2015-10-19 16:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2015-10-19 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julien Grall; +Cc: xen-devel, linux-arm-kernel, Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 19/10/15 11:10, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> Hi Stefano,
> >>
> >> On 16/10/15 17:35, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >>> index 6c09cc4..b193811 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >>> @@ -93,6 +93,16 @@ static void xen_percpu_init(void)
> >>> int err;
> >>> int cpu = get_cpu();
> >>>
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info cannot be called twice for the same
> >>> + * vcpu, so if vcpu_info is already registered, just get out. This
> >>> + * can happen with cpu-hotplug.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) != NULL) {
> >>> + put_cpu();
> >>> + return;
> >>> + }
> >>
> >>
> >> Not really related to this patch. By side effect this patch is also not
> >> calling irq_percpu_enable.
> >>
> >> Looking around, all the caller of irq_percpu_enable will call
> >> irq_percpu_disable when the CPU is dying. Is there any side effect to
> >> not doing this?
> >
> > Given that Xen won't inject any event irqs when a cpu is offline, I
> > don't think there are any side effects.
>
> I'm not talking about the behavior of Xen when the vCPU is down but any
> side effect in Linux (i.e not re-enabling the IRQ or else).
>
> All the other user of percpu IRQ is doing the call so there must be a
> reason to do it.
>
> Looking more closely to the code, the GIC driver will reset the vCPU
> interface every time the vCPU is coming back online (see
> gic_secondary_init).
>
> Resetting the vCPU interface means all the PPIs will be disabled (see
> gic_cpu_config). As the event channel IRQ is a PPI it won't be
> re-enabled and the vCPU will never receive event channel.
>
> So you have to re-enable this interrupt unconditionally. At the same
> time, I'd like to see the irq_percpu_disable to match irq_percpu_enable
> as the other users do.
OK, I'll add a disable_percpu_irq call and an enable_percpu_irq call.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-19 16:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-16 16:33 [PATCH v2] xen,arm: enable cpu_hotplug Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] xen/arm: Enable cpu_hotplug.c Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:40 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-16 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] xen, cpu_hotplug: call device_offline instead of cpu_down Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 16:49 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-19 10:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-19 10:27 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-19 16:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).