From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions - FAIL Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:47:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1445446026.32735.18.camel@citrix.com> References: <20151019135155.GB13286@zion.uk.xensource.com> <22054.21022.517755.482055@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20151020152423.GC29090@zion.uk.xensource.com> <22054.24314.632722.619437@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <22054.24314.632722.619437@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson , Wei Liu Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, osstest service owner List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:34 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions > - FAIL"): > > From mere code inspection and document of lwip 1.3.0 I think mini > -os > > does send gratuitous ARP. > > The guest is using the PVHVM drivers at this point, with the backend > directly in dom0, so it is the guest's gratuitous arp which is needed, > I think. It would be worth investigating whether mini-os's gratuitous ARP might also be occurring and confusing things, e.g. by coming after and therefore taking precedence over the one coming from the guest. Ian.