Re: [PATCH] tools/python: remove broken xl binding

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>]

On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 12:10 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 11:28 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 10:58 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> > > On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > > > > On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > > > > Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't
> > > > > > > work.
> > > > > > > Remove
> > > > > > > it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new
> > > > > > > features
> > > > > > > won't need to worry about making this broken binding happy.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This isn't going to expose any user visible changes because
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > module
> > > > > > > is not built by default.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > And Zhigang mentioned to me offline that he is OK with these
> > > > > being
> > > > > gone too.
> > > > 
> > > > Could we get a formal ack from one of you then please?
> > > 
> > > I'm OK with removing libxl python bindings.
> > 
> > Thanks, are you okay with me translating this into
> > 
> > Acked-by: Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com>
> > 
> > in the final commit?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Acked-by: Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com>

Thanks, acked it myself and applied.