From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: [PATCH] xen/arm: use masking operation instead of test_bit for MCSF bits Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:46:09 +0000 Message-ID: <1447937169-21973-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzOcl-0005kG-80 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:47:39 +0000 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Julien Grall , ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org This is a follow of commit 90f2e2a307fc6a6258c39cc87b3b2bf9441c0fa7 "use masking operation instead of test_bit for MCSF bits" where the ARM changes were missing. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall --- xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c index 880d0a6..1b0f9eb 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ void hypercall_cancel_continuation(void) struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); struct mc_state *mcs = ¤t->mc_state; - if ( test_bit(_MCSF_in_multicall, &mcs->flags) ) + if ( mcs->flags & MCSF_in_multicall ) { __clear_bit(_MCSF_call_preempted, &mcs->flags); } @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ unsigned long hypercall_create_continuation( va_start(args, format); - if ( test_bit(_MCSF_in_multicall, &mcs->flags) ) + if ( mcs->flags & MCSF_in_multicall ) { __set_bit(_MCSF_call_preempted, &mcs->flags); -- 2.1.4