From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 0/4] spinlock: add qrwlocks Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 15:47:17 +0000 Message-ID: <1450453637.4053.233.camel@citrix.com> References: <1450447746-9305-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1a9xH3-0000gG-EG for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 15:48:53 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1450447746-9305-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: David Vrabel , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 14:09 +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > This series adds the qrwlocks from Linux. This really means "replace existing rwlock implementation with qrwlocks", right? i.e. you aren't actually adding a new set of rwlock primitives here, you are just switching out the implementation behind the existing ones. Ian.