xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 76919: regressions - FAIL
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:19:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452079158.7292.34.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452078861.7292.31.camel@citrix.com>

On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 11:14 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 02:26 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 76919 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/76919/
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-
> > install fail REGR. vs. 66879
> 
> ISTR someone (Wei?) at some point saying that a 32-bit stubdom (as used
> here) isn't actually something we wish to support. Shall we either drop
> this test altogether or mark it as allow? Or will someone investigate why
> it apparently can't find its disks.
> 
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/xen-unstable.html

4.6 exhibits the same pattern, as do linux-3.14 and 3.16:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/xen-4.6-testing.html
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/linux-3.14.html
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/linux-3.16.html

(more or less, 3.14 seems to have never gotten lucky)

But recent linux 3.18 and 4.1 results look relatively positive:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/linux-3.18.html
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/linux-4.1.html

Could this have been a dom0 kernel issue, previously masked by merlot*
specific issues, which is since fixed (or less prevalent at least)?

Ian.

> seems to suggest it has a very low probability of success (both merlot
> and
> italia failed dozens of times before passing)
> 
> Nothing in the xen.git range bf925a9f1254..8e4d18e113c9 looks especially
> relevant.
> 
> Bisection couldn't reproduce the basis pass:
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/xen-unstable/t
> est-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm.debian-hvm-
> install.html
> 
> Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-06 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-05  2:26 [xen-unstable test] 76919: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2016-01-06 11:14 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-06 11:19   ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2016-01-06 14:37   ` Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1452079158.7292.34.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).