From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Wei.Lui2@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 77827: regressions - FAIL
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:08:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452784127.2185.49.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22165.11872.378852.10093@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 16:48 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> osstest service owner writes ("[xen-unstable test] 77827: regressions -
> FAIL"):
> > flight 77827 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/77827/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-
> > install fail REGR. vs. 66879
>
> Looking at
>
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-
> i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/xen-unstable.html
>
> and
>
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-
> i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/ALL
>
> it seems that this test has been intermittently broken on most osstest
> branches for some time. 66879 was an [un]lucky pass. (The symptoms,
> and hence the specific test step which fails, seem to vary according
> to the host.)
>
> I am therefore going to force push this.
>
>
> We had a discussion on IRC. Several people were of the opinion that
> 32-bit stubdom will be hard to fix and that the effort won't be worth
> it.
FWIW I agree.
> If we are going to abandon this then we should switch to 64-bit
> stubdom dm in 32-bit dom0 configurations, and certainly not any longer
> build a probably-broken 32-bit stubdom dm along with the 32-bit tools.
Full ack, particularly the second half.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-12 11:27 [xen-unstable test] 77827: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2016-01-12 16:48 ` Ian Jackson
2016-01-14 15:08 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452784127.2185.49.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Wei.Lui2@citrix.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).