[PATCH v5 1/6] remus: don't do failover if we don't have an consistent state

[Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>]

We will have an consistent state when a CHECKPOINT_END record
is received. After the first CHECKPOINT_END record is received,
we will buffer all records until the next CHECKPOINT_END record
is received. So if the checkpoint() callback returns XGR_CHECKPOINT_FAILOVER,
we only can do failover if ctx->restore.buffer_all_records is
true.

Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 tools/libxc/xc_sr_restore.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_restore.c b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_restore.c
index 05159bb..9fe2829 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_restore.c
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_restore.c
@@ -493,7 +493,11 @@ static int handle_checkpoint(struct xc_sr_context *ctx)
         break;
 
     case XGR_CHECKPOINT_FAILOVER:
-        rc = BROKEN_CHANNEL;
+        if ( ctx->restore.buffer_all_records )
+            rc = BROKEN_CHANNEL;
+        else
+            /* We don't have an consistent state */
+            rc = -1;
         goto err;
 
     default: /* Other fatal error */
-- 
2.5.0