xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/PV: allow PV guests to have an emulated PIT
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:03:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453460580.4320.62.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A2171C02000078000C9FAB@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 03:48 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 21.01.16 at 17:51, <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
> > This fixes the fallout from the HVMlite series, that removed the
> > emulated
> > PIT from PV(H) guests. Also, this patch forces the hardware domain to
> > always have an emulated PIT, regardless of whether the toolstack
> > specified
> > one or not.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> albeit ...
> 
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> > @@ -542,8 +542,11 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, unsigned
> > int 
> > domcr_flags,
> >                     d->domain_id, config->emulation_flags);
> >              return -EINVAL;
> >          }
> > +        if ( is_hardware_domain(d) )
> > +            config->emulation_flags |= XEN_X86_EMU_PIT;
> >          if ( config->emulation_flags != 0 &&
> > -             (!is_hvm_domain(d) || config->emulation_flags !=
> > XEN_X86_EMU_ALL) )
> > +             (is_hvm_domain(d) ? (config->emulation_flags !=
> > XEN_X86_EMU_ALL) :
> > +                                 (config->emulation_flags !=
> > XEN_X86_EMU_PIT)) )
> >          {
> 
> ... you having chosen the != route instead of the suggested &
> one, I guess I'll take the liberty to further simplify this while
> committing (as the ?: is now only needed on the right side of the
> != and I'm generally of the opinion that redundancy like this is
> hampering readability).

Readability would be even greater IMHO with the use of a
"required_emulation_flags" variable suitably initialised and then checked,
compared with the use of bitops etc.

> 
> Jan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-22 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-21 16:51 [PATCH v4 0/6] HVMlite: DomU fixes and a Dom0 preparatory patch Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-21 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] libelf: rewrite symtab/strtab loading for Dom0 Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-21 17:29   ` Ian Jackson
2016-01-21 17:55     ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-21 18:44       ` Ian Jackson
2016-01-22  8:11       ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22  9:58         ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-21 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] libxl: introduce LIBXL_VGA_INTERFACE_TYPE_UNKNOWN Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-22 10:59   ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] libxl: initialise the build info before calling prepare_config Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-22 11:00   ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/PV: allow PV guests to have an emulated PIT Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-22 10:48   ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 11:03     ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2016-01-21 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] libxl: add options to enable/disable emulated devices Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-22 17:04   ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-25  9:33     ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 16:51 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/HVM: report the set of enabled emulated devices through CPUID Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-22 10:57   ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 12:43     ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-22 13:24       ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 14:41         ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-22 15:02           ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 15:41             ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-22 13:34       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-22 14:59         ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-22 15:31           ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 15:51             ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-25 11:23               ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1453460580.4320.62.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).