xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com>,
	george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: schedulers and topology exposing questions
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:55:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453974945.26691.10.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A8E802.9090702@citrix.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1152 bytes --]

On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 15:53 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 27/01/16 15:27, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > 
> > So Elena started looking at the CPU bound and seeing how Xen
> > behaves then
> > and if we can improve the floating situation as she saw some
> > abnormal
> > behavious.
> 
> OK -- if the focus was on the two cases where the Xen credit1
> scheduler
> (apparently) co-located two cpu-burning vcpus on sibling threads,
> then
> yeah, that's behavior we should probably try to get to the bottom of.
> 
Well, let's see the trace. 

In any case, I'm up to trying hooking the SMT load balancer in
runq_tickle (which would mean doing it upon every vcpus wakeup).

My gut feeling is that the overhead my outwieght the benefit, and that
it will actually reveal useful only in a minority of the
cases/workloads, but it's maybe worth a try.

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-28  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-22 16:54 schedulers and topology exposing questions Elena Ufimtseva
2016-01-22 17:29 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-01-22 23:58   ` Elena Ufimtseva
2016-01-26 11:21 ` George Dunlap
2016-01-27 14:25   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-01-27 14:33   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-01-27 15:10     ` George Dunlap
2016-01-27 15:27       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-01-27 15:53         ` George Dunlap
2016-01-27 16:12           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-01-28  9:55           ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2016-01-29 21:59             ` Elena Ufimtseva
2016-02-02 11:58               ` Dario Faggioli
2016-01-27 16:03         ` Elena Ufimtseva
2016-01-28  9:46           ` Dario Faggioli
2016-01-29 16:09             ` Elena Ufimtseva
2016-01-28 15:10         ` Dario Faggioli
2016-01-29  3:27           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-02 11:45             ` Dario Faggioli
2016-02-03 18:05               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-01-27 14:01 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-01-28 18:51   ` Elena Ufimtseva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1453974945.26691.10.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).