xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Steven Haigh <netwiz@crc.id.au>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] qemuu only built with i386-softmmu
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:07:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454666869.8672.43.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B47204.5060400@crc.id.au>

On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 20:57 +1100, Steven Haigh wrote:
> 
> > On thing I was sure on (so didn't write) is whether the second
> > paragraph
> > could have an extra sentence:
> > 
> >     If you are using a distro supplied QEMU then the qemu-system-x86_64
> >     could also be used, but it makes no practical difference to the
> >     functionality of the system.
> > 
> > I wasn't sure if that was true (I suspect it is) and in any case I
> > think
> > various bits of libxl etc will look for qemu-system-i386 in various
> > paths
> > so a user would need to try reasonably hard to do so by giving an
> > explicit
> > path and there is no real reason to do so maybe better not to muddy the
> > waters?
> 
> Maybe go along the lines of:
> 
> "There is no practical difference between qemu-system-i386 and
> qemu-system-x86_64 therefore both can be interchanged freely."

Thanks, this is a good wording if it is indeed true (I'll wait for
confirmation of that before I write it on the wiki).

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-05 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-04 21:09 [BUG?] qemuu only built with i386-softmmu Steven Haigh
2016-02-05  9:51 ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-05  9:57   ` Steven Haigh
2016-02-05 10:07     ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2016-02-09 15:49       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-02-09 16:01         ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1454666869.8672.43.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=netwiz@crc.id.au \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).