From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] build: specify minimum versions of gcc and binutils Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:38:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1455205084.814.68.camel@citrix.com> References: <1455193422-14558-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <56BC7F3F.5090006@citrix.com> <1455196872.814.43.camel@citrix.com> <56BC9B7502000078000D108A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56BC9B7502000078000D108A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , Andrew Cooper , stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Doug Goldstein List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:32 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 11.02.16 at 14:21, wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 12:31 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > On 11/02/16 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > From: Doug Goldstein > > > > > > > > To help people avoid having to figure out what versions of gcc and > > > > binutils need to be supported document them explicitly. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell > > > > > > I would be tempted to abbreviate this to GCC 4.1 and Binutls 2.16, > > > unless we specifically know of issues between the release and point > > > releases. > > > > I don't mind doing this but if there is any quibbling at all about it > > then > > I would simply go with what is below. > > Yeah, I'd prefer the patches to go in as they're now: Both > Acked-by: Jan Beulich I have applied them both with you ack and Andy's R-by since he said "Either way". Thanks everyone.