From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: bp@alien8.de
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
luto@amacapital.net, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] x86/rtc: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch check
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 05:08:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455887316-9223-9-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455887316-9223-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org>
The current check is a super long winded way of asking if this
is on lguest. The flags is used for legacy features, this is
likely inspired by the ACPI IA-PC boot architecture flags, where
as for RTC it annotates No CMOS real-time clock present. I don't
expect we will be implementing more legacy features, its simply
pointless so just remove this legacy flag feature thing as well.
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 6 ------
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 5 -----
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 1 -
arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 3 ++-
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 3 ---
5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
index f6192502149e..c261402340e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
@@ -19,12 +19,6 @@ static inline int paravirt_enabled(void)
return pv_info.paravirt_enabled;
}
-static inline int paravirt_has_feature(unsigned int feature)
-{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!pv_info.paravirt_enabled);
- return (pv_info.features & feature);
-}
-
static inline void load_sp0(struct tss_struct *tss,
struct thread_struct *thread)
{
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
index 77db5616a473..2489d6a08e89 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
@@ -70,14 +70,9 @@ struct pv_info {
#endif
int paravirt_enabled;
- unsigned int features; /* valid only if paravirt_enabled is set */
const char *name;
};
-#define paravirt_has(x) paravirt_has_feature(PV_SUPPORTED_##x)
-/* Supported features */
-#define PV_SUPPORTED_RTC (1<<0)
-
struct pv_init_ops {
/*
* Patch may replace one of the defined code sequences with
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 20c11d1aa4cc..10f3614265c1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -472,7 +472,6 @@ static inline unsigned long current_top_of_stack(void)
#else
#define __cpuid native_cpuid
#define paravirt_enabled() 0
-#define paravirt_has(x) 0
static inline void load_sp0(struct tss_struct *tss,
struct thread_struct *thread)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
index 4af8d063fb36..8471523ee127 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <asm/time.h>
#include <asm/intel-mid.h>
#include <asm/rtc.h>
+#include <asm/setup.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
/*
@@ -200,7 +201,7 @@ static __init int add_rtc_cmos(void)
}
#endif
- if (paravirt_enabled() && !paravirt_has(RTC))
+ if (boot_params.hdr.hardware_subarch == X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST)
return -ENODEV;
platform_device_register(&rtc_device);
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index 5b3f1c763806..5c06169bce27 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -1192,7 +1192,6 @@ static const struct pv_info xen_info __initconst = {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
.extra_user_64bit_cs = FLAT_USER_CS64,
#endif
- .features = 0,
.name = "Xen",
};
@@ -1526,8 +1525,6 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
/* Install Xen paravirt ops */
pv_info = xen_info;
- if (xen_initial_domain())
- pv_info.features |= PV_SUPPORTED_RTC;
pv_init_ops = xen_init_ops;
if (!xen_pvh_domain()) {
pv_cpu_ops = xen_cpu_ops;
--
2.7.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-19 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-19 13:08 [PATCH 0/9] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2016-02-19 13:40 ` David Vrabel
2016-02-19 14:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 2/9] tools/lguest: make lguest launcher use X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST explicitly Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/xen: use X86_SUBARCH_XEN for PV guest boots Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/init: make ebda depend on PC subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 15:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-19 20:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 22:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-20 0:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 14:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/tboot: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/cpu/intel: replace paravirt_enabled() for f00f work around Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2016-02-19 13:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] x86/rtc: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch check Juergen Gross
2016-02-19 14:48 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 6:07 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 10:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-22 14:34 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-22 23:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:27 ` David Vrabel
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 9/9] pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch checks Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:34 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible David Vrabel
2016-02-19 14:36 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455887316-9223-9-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).