From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: add hypercall option to temporarily
	pin a vcpu
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:39:02 +0100
Message-ID: <1456493942.2959.187.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1456419000-390-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>
 <56D0395702000078000D69A6@suse.com> <56D033A8.7020009@suse.com>
 <1456485632.2959.154.camel@citrix.com>
 <56D0559C02000078000D6AFE@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
 <1456492038.2959.170.camel@citrix.com>
 <56D0620A02000078000D6BB6@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2332868027852814498=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <56D0620A02000078000D6BB6@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Sender: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <JGross@suse.com>, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============2332868027852814498==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tKY1YDUrTa5UzyBQVDoj"

--=-tKY1YDUrTa5UzyBQVDoj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 06:32 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 26.02.16 at 14:07, <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
> > We can argue about that being useful or not, and about it being
> > (potentially) too noisy or not. I personally think it could be
> > useful
> > (it's XENLOG_DEBUG, after all), but I won't oppose getting rid of
> > it...
> > I am just not getting why you're saying "not currently running on
> > pCPU0".
> Oh, you're right, that was too strict - "not being allowed to run
> on CPU0" would be the right description. And indeed that makes
> it look not as noisy (but too much, since during suspend this is
> what one has to expect would happen).
>
Yes, mostly on the ground that it's the intended behavior and (in that
case really) temporary, I'm indeed ok silencing this on suspend.

Since it's pretty independent, I'd prefer this to be done in a separate
patch, together with the resume side, as (AFAIUI) Juergen is planning
to do already.

Dario
--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-tKY1YDUrTa5UzyBQVDoj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlbQVXYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRjXwCfZTtGATUk9R+InaVBefW7aQ+Q
X30An33px0lwLbJyvg1XA9ui14tbCbxz
=q+cT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-tKY1YDUrTa5UzyBQVDoj--


--===============2332868027852814498==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y
Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK

--===============2332868027852814498==--