From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] xl: Improve return and exit codes of
 main_pause(), main_unpause(),
 main_destroy() and main_shutdown_or_reboot() related functions.
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:59:00 +0100
Message-ID: <1456937940.2959.380.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1456318407-3635-1-git-send-email-write.harmandeep@gmail.com>
 <1456318407-3635-6-git-send-email-write.harmandeep@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3385803094771185660=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
 by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84)
 (envelope-from <prvs=8628d4685=dario.faggioli@citrix.com>)
 id 1abA7l-0004Cz-MR
 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:59:45 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1456318407-3635-6-git-send-email-write.harmandeep@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Sender: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
To: Harmandeep Kaur <write.harmandeep@gmail.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============3385803094771185660==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hhG9ySQ3oQP88vbX9Gd1"

--=-hhG9ySQ3oQP88vbX9Gd1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 18:23 +0530, Harmandeep Kaur wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Harmandeep Kaur <write.harmandeep@gmail.com>
>
Apart from the subject that, as said already, should be more generic,
and from (at least) one long line, this patch looks fine to me.

I'd provide my Reviewed-by, but I asked to move some hunks from patch
4/9 to here, so that would not apply to next version anyway.

In any case, as said, as far as these modification go, they're fine.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-hhG9ySQ3oQP88vbX9Gd1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlbXG9QACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSAXwCfeKVkA0urC+I9Bx57xaSsoVQj
kPAAnjT38d9O9DyHp8tiFkQOv5cs9XVt
=2f/Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-hhG9ySQ3oQP88vbX9Gd1--


--===============3385803094771185660==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y
Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK

--===============3385803094771185660==--