From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 for Xen 4.7 3/4] libxl: enable per-VCPU parameter for RTDS Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:36:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1459960564.3166.104.camel@citrix.com> References: <1459486786-3085-1-git-send-email-lichong659@gmail.com> <1459486786-3085-4-git-send-email-lichong659@gmail.com> <20160401134039.GA27636@citrix.com> <22277.7705.69788.182452@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <22277.9053.446680.253478@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20160406150443.GA8809@citrix.com> <22277.10668.971255.645738@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <22277.11633.516713.933573@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1320029985680736630==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <22277.11633.516713.933573@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Ian Jackson , Chong Lee Cc: Chong Li , Wei Liu , Sisu Xi , george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Meng Xu , dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============1320029985680736630== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pkKuLP3z4/L5H250GB9f" --=-pkKuLP3z4/L5H250GB9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 16:38 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH v9 for Xen 4.7 3/4] libxl: enable > per-VCPU parameter for RTDS"): > >=20 > > Dario points out on irc that perhaps the problem is that I didn't > > apply 2/4.=C2=A0=C2=A0I wasn't CC'd on 2/4, so I foolishly assumed it w= as a > > hypervisor patch (and the HV parts are already in tree). > >=20 > > I will check my view of the xen-devel list. > Indeed.=C2=A0=C2=A0With 2/4 it builds.=C2=A0=C2=A04/4 was also not CC'd t= o me.=C2=A0=C2=A0I used a > copy from the list. >=20 > I have pushed all four. >=20 Thanks Ian! So, Chong, clearly, the build failure was not your fault (as there is no actual build failure), but please, always double check (even when sending new versions of a series) that the appropriate maintainers are Cc-ed... This would help limiting problems like this one we've seen here. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-pkKuLP3z4/L5H250GB9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlcFOvUACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTmlACgpf1f5WvNfL0xY3Ti5LjDVORk W8YAnAvJyOVstZgMhNHJpugCLM4g6RoI =hscw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pkKuLP3z4/L5H250GB9f-- --===============1320029985680736630== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK --===============1320029985680736630==--