From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Paulina Szubarczyk <paulinaszubarczyk@gmail.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, roger.pau@citrix.com,
George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com
Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] xl_cmdimpl: improve return codes for memset commands
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:26:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460103999.13871.31.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459943163-18697-6-git-send-email-paulinaszubarczyk@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1249 bytes --]
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 13:45 +0200, Paulina Szubarczyk wrote:
> --- a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
> @@ -3391,15 +3391,15 @@ static int set_memory_max(uint32_t domid,
> const char *mem)
> memorykb = parse_mem_size_kb(mem);
> if (memorykb == -1) {
> fprintf(stderr, "invalid memory size: %s\n", mem);
> - exit(3);
> + return 1;
>
Mmmm.. I see no reason why this can't remain exit(). In fact, it should
be turned int exit(EXIT_FAILURE), and there's Harmandeep's series --
just resubmitted by me tonight-- outstanding that does that [1].
In any case, this patch is probably not necessary any longer, not
because Harmandeep pending series, but because George take care of what
I think you're trying to do in here in
commit 0614c454209ac67016e2296577abfee9e9dcb012 already.
Regards,
Dario
[1] http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-04/msg01099.html
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-08 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-06 11:45 [PATCH v2 00/10] xl: improve coding style and return more failure on failure for more xl commands Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-06 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] libxl_pci: improve return codes " Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-08 8:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-06 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] libxl-pci: removing the extra 'out_closedir' cleaning path Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-08 8:12 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-06 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] libxl: fix return value of libxl__device_pci_destroy_all Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-08 8:19 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-06 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] xl: improve return code for freemem function Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-06 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] xl_cmdimpl: improve return codes for memset commands Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-08 8:26 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2016-04-08 9:04 ` Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-08 9:41 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-06 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] xl_cmdimpl: improve return codes for cd-insert commands Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-08 8:29 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-06 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] xl_cmdimpl - Add return codes for pci-detach, pci-attach, pci-asssignable-add, and pci-assignable-remove Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-08 8:36 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-06 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] libxl: improve main_tmem_* return codes Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-08 9:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-06 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] libxl: Fix libxl_set_memory_target return value Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-06 12:54 ` George Dunlap
2016-04-06 13:21 ` Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-06 13:53 ` George Dunlap
2016-04-06 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] libxl: libxl_tmem functions improving coding style Paulina Szubarczyk
2016-04-08 8:54 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1460103999.13871.31.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=paulinaszubarczyk@gmail.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).