xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen: Document XEN_SYSCTL_CPUPOOL_OP_RMCPU anomalous EBUSY result
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:33:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460727223.13871.259.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5710EABB.3010003@suse.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1667 bytes --]

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 15:20 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 15/04/16 12:58, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 12:43 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > 
> > > The EBUSY returns of not successful repair attempts (trying to
> > > assign
> > > a
> > > cpu to another cpupool) should be changed to e.g. EADDRNOTAVAIL?
> > > 
> > I'd go for EADDRINUSE and EADDRNOTAVAIL so the two error values are
> > similarly *wrong* hinting an addressing issue, which is more
> > consistent
> > (and would come handy when documenting) than having one pointing at
> > the
> > filesystem and the other at the address space.
> Just saw there are still two cases left where EBUSY will be returned:
> 
I know...

> - when trying to remove the last cpu from a cpupool with active
> domains
>   (EBUSY seems appropriate)
>
Indeed.

> - when trying to move a cpu which is not available in the source
> cpupool
>   or free cpus (I'd suggest ENODEV in this case)
> 
Well, in practice, I don't actually think this is too big of a deal. In
fact, I don't think that tools can or need to differentiate their
behavior too much between this and, for instance, the above mentioned
failure.

_However_, if while you're there you're up for making this case
returning ENODEV, it would indeed look like it's more descriptive of
the actual problem, and hence better.

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-15 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14 17:07 [PATCH 0/3] Revert xc cpupool retries and document anomaly Ian Jackson
2016-04-14 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] libxc: Revert "do some retries in xc_cpupool_removecpu() for EBUSY case" Ian Jackson
2016-04-15  5:15   ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-15  7:46     ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-14 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen: hypercall docs annotations for xen_sysctl_cpupool_op Ian Jackson
2016-04-14 20:37   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-15 10:27     ` Ian Jackson
2016-04-14 17:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen: Document XEN_SYSCTL_CPUPOOL_OP_RMCPU anomalous EBUSY result Ian Jackson
2016-04-14 17:24   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-14 17:56     ` Ian Jackson
2016-04-14 20:22       ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-15 10:20         ` Ian Jackson
2016-04-15 10:43           ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-15 10:58             ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-15 11:37               ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-15 13:20               ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-15 13:33                 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2016-04-15 14:11                 ` Ian Jackson
2016-04-15 14:39                   ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-15  5:35   ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-15  7:42     ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-15 14:12       ` Ian Jackson
2016-04-15 14:17         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-15 14:34         ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-15 14:44           ` Ian Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1460727223.13871.259.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).