From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 92791: regressions - FAIL
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:02:21 +0200
Message-ID: <1461679341.3525.58.camel@citrix.com>
References: <osstest-92791-mainreport@xen.org>
 <1461678076.3525.56.camel@citrix.com> <20160426135352.GK20763@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7170799854964449616=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160426135352.GK20763@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Sender: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============7170799854964449616==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zxGnmEI3jc1lQtLVhgoC"

--=-zxGnmEI3jc1lQtLVhgoC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 14:53 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:41:16PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> >=20
> > On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 12:59 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > >=20
> > > flight 92791 xen-unstable real [real]
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92791/
> > >=20
> > > Regressions :-(
> > >=20
> > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > > including tests which could not be run:
> > > =C2=A0test-armhf-armhf-libvirt=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A06 x=
en-boot=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0fail
> > > REGR.
> > > vs. 92651
> > >=20
> > I forgot with which ARM board we have some network reliability
> > issues
> > (ijc used to remind that to me all the times! BTW, this is an
> > arndale),
> > but looking at the bottom of the logs:
> >=20
[..]
> >=20
> > it looks to me like this could be one of those cases.
> >=20
> > Yet, I'm Cc-ing libvirt and ARM people.
> >=20
> Thanks for looking into this.
>=20
:-)

> I looked at the range of commits. I don't think it would cause ARM
> not
> to boot because they are mostly x86 and tools patches.
>=20
> So it could be that the network is not reliable on arndale.
>=20
And I've confirmed that it was indeed Arndale boards that show similar
behavior already, from time to time.

Dario
--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-zxGnmEI3jc1lQtLVhgoC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlcfdO0ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTpUwCfSc87EPZnzHTZT0akCA1JucJ2
81kAoI2vJUbsL8PsUNAJQ2DoAhtXUuCC
=Vhf/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-zxGnmEI3jc1lQtLVhgoC--


--===============7170799854964449616==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y
Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK

--===============7170799854964449616==--