xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	"Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"keir@xen.org" <keir@xen.org>,
	"george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com" <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"jbeulich@suse.com" <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:36:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466778999.18398.107.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d22bc57a-caa2-5238-5c19-8a3cbec90cec@citrix.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1659 bytes --]

On Fri, 2016-06-24 at 14:49 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 24/06/16 14:42, Wu, Feng wrote:
> > Here is my understanding, if the guest has nothing to do, it will
> > call HLT, and Xen hypervisor will call vcpu_block(), if we don't
> > block the vCPU and return to guest, guest will continue to run
> > HLT if it still has nothing to do. 
> As it happens, most operating systems will handle this situation just
> fine; but I'm not sure this is something we want to rely on.
> 
Exactly! I indeed don't think it would be wise to rely on that. But
more than that, I don't think we want to waste pCPU cycles considering
runnable, and hence potentially scheduling, vCPUs that have HTL-ed!

That may be acceptable in emulators like Bochs or "plain" Qemu... Xen
is an hypervisor, it does virtualization, and this is one of the points
of virtualization, IMO: when a virtual CPU has nothing to do, use the
physical CPU to execute _another_ virtual CPU.

And even if that would be just for the sake of handling a corner case,
I still think that:
 - we really want to try as hard as possible to avoid it,
 - if we really can't, we want a big comment in the code for:
  * explaining what actually happens,
  * proving that it will be something limited in time (and preferably
    rather short),
  * providing an explanations of why we could not do better.

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2016-06-24 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-26 13:39 [PATCH v2 0/4] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list Feng Wu
2016-05-26 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] VMX: Properly handle pi when all the assigned devices are removed Feng Wu
2016-05-27 13:43   ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 10:22     ` Wu, Feng
2016-05-31 11:52       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-03  5:12         ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-03  9:45           ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-26 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] VMX: Cleanup PI per-cpu blocking list when vcpu is destroyed Feng Wu
2016-05-27 13:49   ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 10:22     ` Wu, Feng
2016-05-31 11:54       ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-26 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] VMX: Assign the right value to 'NDST' field in a concern case Feng Wu
2016-05-27 14:00   ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 10:27     ` Wu, Feng
2016-05-31 11:58       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-03  5:23         ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-03  9:57           ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-22 18:00   ` George Dunlap
2016-06-24  9:08     ` Wu, Feng
2016-05-26 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] VMX: fixup PI descritpor when cpu is offline Feng Wu
2016-05-27 14:56   ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 10:31     ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-22 18:33       ` George Dunlap
2016-06-24  6:34         ` Wu, Feng
2016-05-26 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list Dario Faggioli
2016-05-31 10:19   ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-22 21:33     ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-24  6:33       ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-24 10:29         ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-24 13:42           ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-24 13:49             ` George Dunlap
2016-06-24 14:36               ` Dario Faggioli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466778999.18398.107.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).