From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerd Hoffmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: use a common function for pv and hvm guest backend register calls Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:40:56 +0200 Message-ID: <1470138056.30562.95.camel@redhat.com> References: <1470119552-16170-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1470119552-16170-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" To: Juergen Gross Cc: anthony.perard@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Di, 2016-08-02 at 08:32 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > Instead of calling xen_be_register() for each supported backend type > for hvm and pv guests in their machine init functions use a common > function in order not to have to add new backends twice. >=20 > This at once fixes the error that hvm domains couldn't use the qusb > backend. Looks good to me. Should I take this through the usb patch queue, together with the other xen-usb fixes (once codestyle issues are fixed)? If so, can I get an ack from xen please, preferably fast enough for -rc2? thanks, Gerd