From: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>,
george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
dario.faggioli@citrix.com, jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] VMX: Fixup PI descritpor when cpu is offline
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:56:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472615791-8664-7-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472615791-8664-1-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com>
When cpu is offline, we need to move all the vcpus in its blocking
list to another online cpu, this patch handles it.
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c | 1 +
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
index 1bd875a..f554d4c 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
@@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ void vmx_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
vmx_free_vmcs(per_cpu(vmxon_region, cpu));
per_cpu(vmxon_region, cpu) = 0;
nvmx_cpu_dead(cpu);
+ vmx_pi_desc_fixup(cpu);
}
int vmx_cpu_up(void)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 071c063..5f428b7 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -211,6 +211,60 @@ static void vmx_pi_blocking_cleanup(struct vcpu *v)
vmx_pi_remove_vcpu_from_blocking_list(v);
}
+void vmx_pi_desc_fixup(int cpu)
+{
+ unsigned int new_cpu, dest;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct arch_vmx_struct *vmx, *tmp;
+ spinlock_t *new_lock, *old_lock = &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, cpu).lock;
+ struct list_head *blocked_vcpus = &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, cpu).list;
+
+ if ( !iommu_intpost )
+ return;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(old_lock, flags);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(vmx, tmp, blocked_vcpus, pi_blocking.list)
+ {
+ /*
+ * We need to find an online cpu as the NDST of the PI descriptor, it
+ * doesn't matter whether it is within the cpupool of the domain or
+ * not. As long as it is online, the vCPU will be woken up once the
+ * notification event arrives.
+ */
+restart:
+ new_cpu = cpumask_any(&cpu_online_map);
+ new_lock = &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, new_cpu).lock;
+
+ spin_lock(new_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * If the new_cpu is not online, that means it became offline between
+ * we got 'new_cpu' and acquiring its lock above, we need to find
+ * another online cpu instead. Such as, this fucntion is being called
+ * on 'new_cpu' at the same time. Can this happen??
+ */
+ if ( !cpu_online(new_cpu) )
+ {
+ spin_unlock(new_lock);
+ goto restart;
+ }
+
+ ASSERT(vmx->pi_blocking.lock == old_lock);
+
+ dest = cpu_physical_id(new_cpu);
+ write_atomic(&vmx->pi_desc.ndst,
+ x2apic_enabled ? dest : MASK_INSR(dest, PI_xAPIC_NDST_MASK));
+
+ list_move(&vmx->pi_blocking.list,
+ &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, new_cpu).list);
+ vmx->pi_blocking.lock = new_lock;
+ spin_unlock(new_lock);
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(old_lock, flags);
+}
+
/* This function is called when pcidevs_lock is held */
void vmx_pi_hooks_assign(struct domain *d)
{
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
index 4cdd9b1..9783c70 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -569,6 +569,7 @@ void free_p2m_hap_data(struct p2m_domain *p2m);
void p2m_init_hap_data(struct p2m_domain *p2m);
void vmx_pi_per_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu);
+void vmx_pi_desc_fixup(int cpu);
void vmx_pi_hooks_assign(struct domain *d);
void vmx_pi_hooks_deassign(struct domain *d);
--
2.1.0
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-31 3:56 [PATCH v3 0/6] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list Feng Wu
2016-08-31 3:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] VMX: Statically assign two PI hooks Feng Wu
2016-09-01 8:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-01 9:13 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-01 9:23 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-01 9:38 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-06 8:42 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-06 9:53 ` Wu, Feng
2016-08-31 3:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] VMX: Properly handle pi when all the assigned devices are removed Feng Wu
2016-09-01 8:21 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-01 9:22 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-01 10:23 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-01 13:12 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-06 8:58 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-08-31 3:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] VMX: Cleanup PI per-cpu blocking list when vcpu is destroyed Feng Wu
2016-09-06 9:21 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-06 23:27 ` Wu, Feng
2016-08-31 3:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] Pause/Unpause the domain before/after assigning PI hooks Feng Wu
2016-09-01 8:29 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02 1:46 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02 7:04 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02 7:31 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02 8:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02 8:40 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02 9:25 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02 10:30 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02 10:45 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02 13:15 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02 13:54 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-05 3:11 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-05 9:27 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-14 2:23 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-14 8:46 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-14 14:51 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-18 8:37 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-19 23:12 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-20 0:48 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-20 7:31 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-20 7:53 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-20 8:13 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-20 8:18 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-23 14:19 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-26 2:53 ` Wu, Feng
2016-08-31 3:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] VT-d: No need to set irq affinity for posted format IRTE Feng Wu
2016-09-01 8:38 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02 1:58 ` Wu, Feng
2016-08-31 3:56 ` Feng Wu [this message]
2016-09-01 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] VMX: Fixup PI descritpor when cpu is offline Jan Beulich
2016-09-02 3:25 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02 7:08 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1472615791-8664-7-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com \
--to=feng.wu@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).