xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xen/x86: Fix build with clang following c/s 4fa0105
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:21:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473358896-20408-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> (raw)

https://travis-ci.org/xen-project/xen/jobs/158494027#L2344

Clang complains:

  emulate.c:2016:14: error: comparison of unsigned enum expression < 0
  is always false [-Werror,-Wtautological-compare]
      if ( seg < 0 || seg >= ARRAY_SIZE(hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg) )
           ~~~ ^ ~

Clang is wrong to raise a warning like this.  The signed-ness of an enum is
implementation defined in C, and robust code must not assume the choices made
by the compiler.

In this case, dropping the < 0 check creates a latent bug which would result
in an array underflow when compiled with a compiler which chooses a signed
enum.

Work around the bug by explicitly pulling seg into an unsigned integer, and
only perform the upper bounds check.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c      | 19 +++++++++++--------
 xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c |  9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
index e3bfda5..cc25676 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
@@ -1447,13 +1447,14 @@ static int hvmemul_write_segment(
 {
     struct hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt =
         container_of(ctxt, struct hvm_emulate_ctxt, ctxt);
+    unsigned int idx = seg;
 
-    if ( seg < 0 || seg >= ARRAY_SIZE(hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg) )
+    if ( idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg) )
         return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
 
-    hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg[seg] = *reg;
-    __set_bit(seg, &hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg_accessed);
-    __set_bit(seg, &hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg_dirty);
+    hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg[idx] = *reg;
+    __set_bit(idx, &hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg_accessed);
+    __set_bit(idx, &hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg_dirty);
 
     return X86EMUL_OKAY;
 }
@@ -2012,12 +2013,14 @@ struct segment_register *hvmemul_get_seg_reg(
     enum x86_segment seg,
     struct hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt)
 {
-    if ( seg < 0 || seg >= ARRAY_SIZE(hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg) )
+    unsigned int idx = seg;
+
+    if ( idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg) )
         return ERR_PTR(-X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE);
 
-    if ( !__test_and_set_bit(seg, &hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg_accessed) )
-        hvm_get_segment_register(current, seg, &hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg[seg]);
-    return &hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg[seg];
+    if ( !__test_and_set_bit(idx, &hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg_accessed) )
+        hvm_get_segment_register(current, idx, &hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg[idx]);
+    return &hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg[idx];
 }
 
 static const char *guest_x86_mode_to_str(int mode)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
index 8d6661c..21607bf 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
@@ -130,14 +130,15 @@ __initcall(shadow_audit_key_init);
 static struct segment_register *hvm_get_seg_reg(
     enum x86_segment seg, struct sh_emulate_ctxt *sh_ctxt)
 {
+    unsigned int idx = seg;
     struct segment_register *seg_reg;
 
-    if ( seg < 0 || seg >= ARRAY_SIZE(sh_ctxt->seg_reg) )
+    if ( idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(sh_ctxt->seg_reg) )
         return ERR_PTR(-X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE);
 
-    seg_reg = &sh_ctxt->seg_reg[seg];
-    if ( !__test_and_set_bit(seg, &sh_ctxt->valid_seg_regs) )
-        hvm_get_segment_register(current, seg, seg_reg);
+    seg_reg = &sh_ctxt->seg_reg[idx];
+    if ( !__test_and_set_bit(idx, &sh_ctxt->valid_seg_regs) )
+        hvm_get_segment_register(current, idx, seg_reg);
     return seg_reg;
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2016-09-08 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-08 18:21 Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-09-09  8:38 ` [PATCH] xen/x86: Fix build with clang following c/s 4fa0105 Jan Beulich
2016-09-09 10:28 ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1473358896-20408-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).