From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 for 4.8] docs: feature documents for the schedulers Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:44:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1476362668.3314.6.camel@citrix.com> References: <147635565298.17095.17316867931713209620.stgit@Palanthas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6266739934282311857==" Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bufNE-0004yL-Ib for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:44:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Andrew Cooper , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Lars Kurth , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , George Dunlap , Anshul Makkar , Ian Jackson , Meng Xu , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============6266739934282311857== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HjP6wzKzFJzqewUB607b" --=-HjP6wzKzFJzqewUB607b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 12:28 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 13/10/16 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > "Just" as per the subject, I wrote feature documents for (almost) > > all our > > schedulers. No big deal, I'd say, apart from the fact that I'm > > declaring > > Credit2 **Supperted**, instead of experimental. >=20 > Supperted?=C2=A0=C2=A0That's like supported right? ;p >=20 Nah, 'supperted' is the new 'supported', didn't you know? :-P > It is fine for you to propose that a feature should be upgraded to > supported, and this is probably the best way to formally do so. >=20 > However, final agreement of a feature becoming supported should > include > input from the security team. (At the end of the day, it is us with > extra work if the feature isn't up to scratch.) >=20 Ok, so, if that's the case, what's the process: resend (this patch) -- or some other kind of formal request-- with security@xenproject.org Cc-ed? Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-HjP6wzKzFJzqewUB607b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJX/4GsAAoJEBZCeImluHPudcoP/0sf4zaPzR/GX+tDvfgyCPux 1Gp5v6nuBRXwDAd+zthuQa6E00CA73n/sKJwowfjxhF5vRFdFsxnMK9/xOhUY6bM O7odhP4eb2N4vpcLFArgfMFMcbsGTXLXrNIcH6fWETFWiHhl24ZpMybfUsRfHRl8 x3FKxwxMBKKcYc7utogyj43nDSTOcylA96c9IzPyIz15eZggNaae0JxOM5tt1tzh YQb60WjMA3Geki8ElI539zynBvsUdAaUnPXWPRBao9sPMjZE/wqHvnQ6/WlUdBC+ 84IBzvXda9nqCb3A40Gr/Up+m8YuCQ51ySwsckyWIvDn2xDSA9EMMJ51S4mrXMe3 qDntKGOYH+WBJHbpLyi9b1LPYNKYNyjnqRW0DB5Pm0JSi/C3wGe+NsCh/QaRyyi5 Wxd5QzCR3zfAk/eWb+OqQ/LAkdaQC2e8Q7a70u3bDSMNThwEi15V5Q0C472NB0Sl Pe+pIkexzOjZAC0KVE58thLPGZqz4v8fk8yjDinebhu6jPxfSHBpfeLJWY1LuyfG rBnmQmRrIek/Nzo1rz2rqWbZDuV8Bwh7SV6AsanKBfwZ4j+fZMMkIQrFzbkhV1HL fd0Xf740NJJegGb2G5oPLLT0nkpRwQxpne5b6ScVhTaQWzhMqLWpyRCjy7wAmfYM urN8VF0d3J04h2dtQHth =f3NW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HjP6wzKzFJzqewUB607b-- --===============6266739934282311857== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLnhlbi5v cmcveGVuLWRldmVsCg== --===============6266739934282311857==--