From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: Xen like VirtualBox Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:40:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1479148810.6046.26.camel@citrix.com> References: <706778434.1491253.1478802016016.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <706778434.1491253.1478802016016@mail.yahoo.com> <1479131438.6046.17.camel@citrix.com> <456833396.3707141.1479132318277@mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6838304256802796939==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <456833396.3707141.1479132318277@mail.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Jason Long , "Xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============6838304256802796939== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KiYUC+WAXuNTgMZvkJ41" --=-KiYUC+WAXuNTgMZvkJ41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 14:05 +0000, Jason Long wrote: > Thank you but the problem is that "virt-manager" is for Redhat and > Redhat don't like Xen anymore because of KVM. > That's not really accurate. Virt-manager is --at least last time I've tried, which is not too long ago-- a GUI front-end for libvirt. It is may be true that a lot of its contributors works for or are related to RedHat, and it is probably still true that it does its best with KVM... But it actually works with Xen already (it, at least up to a certain extent, should work with whatever uses libvirt). In fact, if you go to=C2=A0https://virt-manager.org/=C2=A0, this is what yo= u find: "The virt-manager application is a desktop user interface for managing virtual machines through libvirt. It primarily targets KVM VMs, but also manages Xen and LXC (linux containers)." It could be made a lot better, when used on Xen, but that will only happen with some effort, and helping us assessing what does work and what does not, would be a very valuable contribution. > Another problem is that a program like VirtualBox has a nice GUI but > virt-manager not. >=20 Mmm.. so, you're saying that you like VirtualBox's GUI but you don't like virt-manager's one, right? In which case, oh, well... Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-KiYUC+WAXuNTgMZvkJ41 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJYKgUKAAoJEBZCeImluHPuE1MQAJkuDO6DMRceqRgaUf3J4iu7 TY7rit2DDPp1+t5qvegVjjHzmZ2Im3eENv1DlNpSCK2kECbarWYjewSq3/s8M5a8 nIdFG42MGWTs5/cP9jQMKzlqXlSsIipScxZzCVmHkI1ZAFgftEn3bcuVK8RlsSuq 76xG3WQZ5k7oizS6LUoqJ83yF/xVL9n8uvkdCwDz2oGWYqzGOkFwwE1RBDwzJqoo SIv0LdDhx/m7BbzdUuhr4bOGMxo9wpN3hJGHr++9cqh6pAAbSkNWGM7aP95Kmr0Z 2UB7BeCxhEiw1mT+qQZYO1Ud5EhgPkC3V04OLFjNJj+miCUJ7evoRcAQsjxRTHhj SDVAWSyHtnntswHX8JUy2e0p1Ms9KXBuKE7JMXddA2BuM/93wzizBgGsPtukeaed Tn8kCLk9jIX5Ds9HbXrIJyYAlxugYkldmzj0t+ahTnn/h1dWtgQu6V5yWmmVNtHt jg0ZJBRh5C0JWXWPspp7YDCPDm9CPE3xvV1xixycHLM3xZ2iLGnnvG/I1Ae7ksFc vUrLobBspVWkrPEuc5XO60k4bsFxOW4oSU6GYvdZRDInCnccg8vfg///eBj5AD1D 4x4jlsR3H+NEvk5mp4pUrbs14xy7zWK3VI2JdXFNvjdsdwwQXZIdmzcluysAzYLq +Wg3DO6e8T7n+MLHt3yv =6k3R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KiYUC+WAXuNTgMZvkJ41-- --===============6838304256802796939== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLnhlbi5v cmcveGVuLWRldmVsCg== --===============6838304256802796939==--