From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/24] x86/emul: Implement singlestep as a retire flag
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:50:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480513841-7565-12-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480513841-7565-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
The behaviour of singlestep is to raise #DB after the instruction has been
completed, but implementing it with inject_hw_exception() causes x86_emulate()
to return X86EMUL_EXCEPTION, despite succesfully completing execution of the
instruction, including register writeback.
Instead, use a retire flag to indicate singlestep, which causes x86_emulate()
to return X86EMUL_OKAY.
Update all callers of x86_emulate() to use the new retire flag. This fixes
the behaviour of singlestep for shadow pagetable updates and mmcfg/mmio_ro
intercepts, which previously discarded the exception.
With this change, all uses of X86EMUL_EXCEPTION from x86_emulate() are
believed to have strictly fault semantics.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
v3:
* New
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c | 3 +++
xen/arch/x86/mm.c | 11 ++++++++++-
xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c | 9 ++++-----
xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h | 6 ++++++
5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
index fe62500..91c79fa 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
@@ -1788,6 +1788,9 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt,
if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY )
return rc;
+ if ( hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt.retire.singlestep )
+ hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_debug, X86_EVENT_NO_EC);
+
new_intr_shadow = hvmemul_ctxt->intr_shadow;
/* MOV-SS instruction toggles MOV-SS shadow, else we just clear it. */
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
index b7c7122..231c7bf 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
@@ -5382,6 +5382,9 @@ int ptwr_do_page_fault(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long addr,
if ( rc == X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE )
goto bail;
+ if ( ptwr_ctxt.ctxt.retire.singlestep )
+ pv_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_debug, X86_EVENT_NO_EC);
+
perfc_incr(ptwr_emulations);
return EXCRET_fault_fixed;
@@ -5503,7 +5506,13 @@ int mmio_ro_do_page_fault(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long addr,
else
rc = x86_emulate(&ctxt, &mmio_ro_emulate_ops);
- return rc != X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE ? EXCRET_fault_fixed : 0;
+ if ( rc == X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE )
+ return 0;
+
+ if ( ctxt.retire.singlestep )
+ pv_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_debug, X86_EVENT_NO_EC);
+
+ return EXCRET_fault_fixed;
}
void *alloc_xen_pagetable(void)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
index 9ee48a8..ddfb815 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
@@ -3422,6 +3422,16 @@ static int sh_page_fault(struct vcpu *v,
v->arch.paging.last_write_emul_ok = 0;
#endif
+ if ( emul_ctxt.ctxt.retire.singlestep )
+ {
+ if ( is_hvm_vcpu(v) )
+ hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_debug, X86_EVENT_NO_EC);
+ else
+ pv_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_debug, X86_EVENT_NO_EC);
+
+ goto emulate_done;
+ }
+
#if GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS == 3 /* PAE guest */
if ( r == X86EMUL_OKAY ) {
int i, emulation_count=0;
@@ -3433,7 +3443,7 @@ static int sh_page_fault(struct vcpu *v,
shadow_continue_emulation(&emul_ctxt, regs);
v->arch.paging.last_write_was_pt = 0;
r = x86_emulate(&emul_ctxt.ctxt, emul_ops);
- if ( r == X86EMUL_OKAY )
+ if ( r == X86EMUL_OKAY && !emul_ctxt.ctxt.retire.raw )
{
emulation_count++;
if ( v->arch.paging.last_write_was_pt )
@@ -3449,6 +3459,15 @@ static int sh_page_fault(struct vcpu *v,
{
perfc_incr(shadow_em_ex_fail);
TRACE_SHADOW_PATH_FLAG(TRCE_SFLAG_EMULATION_LAST_FAILED);
+
+ if ( emul_ctxt.ctxt.retire.singlestep )
+ {
+ if ( is_hvm_vcpu(v) )
+ hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_debug, X86_EVENT_NO_EC);
+ else
+ pv_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_debug, X86_EVENT_NO_EC);
+ }
+
break; /* Don't emulate again if we failed! */
}
}
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
index 8a1f1f5..0af532e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
@@ -2417,7 +2417,6 @@ x86_emulate(
struct x86_emulate_state state;
int rc;
uint8_t b, d;
- bool tf = ctxt->regs->eflags & EFLG_TF;
struct operand src = { .reg = PTR_POISON };
struct operand dst = { .reg = PTR_POISON };
enum x86_swint_type swint_type;
@@ -5415,11 +5414,11 @@ x86_emulate(
if ( !mode_64bit() )
_regs.eip = (uint32_t)_regs.eip;
- *ctxt->regs = _regs;
+ /* Was singestepping active at the start of this instruction? */
+ if ( (rc == X86EMUL_OKAY) && (ctxt->regs->eflags & EFLG_TF) )
+ ctxt->retire.singlestep = true;
- /* Inject #DB if single-step tracing was enabled at instruction start. */
- if ( tf && (rc == X86EMUL_OKAY) && ops->inject_hw_exception )
- rc = ops->inject_hw_exception(EXC_DB, -1, ctxt) ? : X86EMUL_EXCEPTION;
+ *ctxt->regs = _regs;
done:
_put_fpu();
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
index fc28976..da8924b 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
@@ -483,6 +483,7 @@ struct x86_emulate_ctxt
bool hlt:1; /* Instruction HLTed. */
bool mov_ss:1; /* Instruction sets MOV-SS irq shadow. */
bool sti:1; /* Instruction sets STI irq shadow. */
+ bool singlestep:1; /* Singlestepping was active. */
};
} retire;
};
@@ -572,12 +573,17 @@ static inline int x86_emulate_wrapper(
struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
const struct x86_emulate_ops *ops)
{
+ unsigned long orig_eip = ctxt->regs->eip;
int rc = x86_emulate(ctxt, ops);
/* Retire flags should only be set for successful instruction emulation. */
if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY )
ASSERT(ctxt->retire.raw == 0);
+ /* All cases returning X86EMUL_EXCEPTION should have fault semantics. */
+ if ( rc == X86EMUL_EXCEPTION )
+ ASSERT(ctxt->regs->eip == orig_eip);
+
return rc;
}
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-30 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-30 13:50 [PATCH for-4.9 v3 00/24] XSA-191 followup Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/24] x86/shadow: Fix #PFs from emulated writes crossing a page boundary Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/24] x86/emul: Drop X86EMUL_CMPXCHG_FAILED Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/24] x86/emul: Simplfy emulation state setup Andrew Cooper
2016-12-08 6:34 ` George Dunlap
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/24] x86/emul: Rename hvm_trap to x86_event and move it into the emulation infrastructure Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/24] x86/emul: Rename HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE to X86_EVENT_NO_EC Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/24] x86/pv: Implement pv_inject_{event, page_fault, hw_exception}() Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/24] x86/emul: Clean up the naming of the retire union Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:58 ` Paul Durrant
2016-11-30 14:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 14:05 ` Paul Durrant
2016-11-30 16:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 10:08 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 08/24] x86/emul: Correct the behaviour of pop %ss and interrupt shadowing Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 10:18 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 10:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:19 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 09/24] x86/emul: Provide a wrapper to x86_emulate() to ASSERT() certain behaviour Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 10:40 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 10:58 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:21 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 10/24] x86/emul: Always use fault semantics for software events Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 17:55 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-01 10:53 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 11:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:23 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-11-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 11/24] x86/emul: Implement singlestep as a retire flag Paul Durrant
2016-12-01 11:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 11:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:33 ` Tim Deegan
2016-12-01 12:05 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 12/24] x86/emul: Remove opencoded exception generation Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 13/24] x86/emul: Rework emulator event injection Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 14:26 ` Paul Durrant
2016-12-01 11:35 ` Tim Deegan
2016-12-01 12:31 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 14/24] x86/vmx: Use hvm_{get, set}_segment_register() rather than vmx_{get, set}_segment_register() Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 15/24] x86/hvm: Reposition the modification of raw segment data from the VMCB/VMCS Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 16/24] x86/emul: Avoid raising faults behind the emulators back Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 17/24] x86/pv: " Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:50 ` Tim Deegan
2016-12-01 12:57 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 13:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 13:27 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 18/24] x86/shadow: " Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:39 ` Tim Deegan
2016-12-01 11:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 13:00 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 13:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 19/24] x86/hvm: Extend the hvm_copy_*() API with a pagefault_info pointer Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 20/24] x86/hvm: Reimplement hvm_copy_*_nofault() in terms of no pagefault_info Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 21/24] x86/hvm: Rename hvm_copy_*_guest_virt() to hvm_copy_*_guest_linear() Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 22/24] x86/hvm: Avoid __hvm_copy() raising #PF behind the emulators back Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 14:29 ` Paul Durrant
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 23/24] x86/emul: Prepare to allow use of system segments for memory references Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 24/24] x86/emul: Use system-segment relative memory accesses Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480513841-7565-12-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).