From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com, julien.grall@arm.com, sstabellini@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/1] xen/arm: Map mmio-sram nodes as cached memory
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:37:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1482237467-17879-1-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> (raw)
From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
This patch changes the mapping from non-cached to cached
for mmio-sram nodes that do not have the no-memory-wc property.
This is a hang-over from 4.8 since the mmio-sram patches went
in late in the cycle.
I've explained the rationale in the commit message:
Although on chip memories are relatively fast compared to
off-chip memories, large on chip memories are still
significantly slower than L1 caches. Depending on the
memory, either cached or uncached may make most sense.
Also, hardware domains may like to use the memory in a
cache-coherent way to avoid SW managed coherency.
By mapping it cached at S2, we let hardware domains select
cacheability via S1 mappings.
This was also discussed here:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-05/msg02412.html
Were we reached the conclusion that we should be using the most relaxed
attributes as long as we don't compromise security.
Since mmio-sram DTS noders have a property (no-memory-wc) to describe
srams with access restrictions, we can select the most relaxed mode
for unrestricted ones.
Cheers,
Edgar
ChangeLog:
v1 -> v2:
* Spell out On Chip Memories (OCMs)
* Avoid dom0 in preference of hardware domains
* Fix spelling of although
Edgar E. Iglesias (1):
xen/arm: Map mmio-sram nodes as cached memory
xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next reply other threads:[~2016-12-20 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-20 12:37 Edgar E. Iglesias [this message]
2016-12-20 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] xen/arm: Map mmio-sram nodes as cached memory Edgar E. Iglesias
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1482237467-17879-1-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--to=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).