xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@citrix.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:33:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483608825465.37527@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483605555.32021.106.camel@citrix.com>

On 05/01/2017 08:39, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 02:05 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 05/01/2017 01:52, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> It works just fine with credit1 (see further down the log)
>>> but if I try credit2 it ends up hanging during bootup.
>>>
>>> I am a going to naively assume it is due to how the vCPUs are
>>> exposed (Where they match the physical CPUs under credit1),
>>> but under credit2 they are different.
>>>
>>> The dom0_max_vcpus does not seem to have any affect. When I remove
>>> it
>>> things are still being problematic.
>>>
>>> Help!?
>>
>> This matches the symptoms seen by XenServer when trying to stress
>> 32vcpu
>> guests under Credit2.  Malcolm did find (based on interpreted iperf
>> throughput graphs) that Credit2 did seem to preferentially schedule
>> the
>> lower-number vcpus, rather than scheduling them evenly.
>>
> To be fair (and just for the records, since the cause seems actually to
> be something else), this was with an old version (at least two Xen
> releases ago, IIRC, certainly not 4.8) and known to be buggy version of
> Credit2.
>
> We have other tests and benchmarks, done on equally big machines which
> proves the scheduler is 100% functional.
>
Yes, I have done extensive stress tests on XenSever(IIRC Xen - 4.7) with 
Credit2 on 32 or more VCPU guests. Didn't see any hangups.

Malcolm, did find hangup and crash issues with 32VCPU guests, but the 
issue was highlighted and fixed. So, during my testing I specifically 
foucussed on this scenario and found no problem.

> Regards,
> Dario
>

Anshul

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-05  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18 15:05 [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2017-01-05  1:52 ` Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-01-05  2:05   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05  8:39     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-05  9:33       ` Anshul Makkar [this message]
2017-01-05  2:10   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-01-05  3:13     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-06 15:55       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-12 12:50       ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-12 16:22         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-12 16:41           ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-12 18:27             ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-13  3:20               ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-13  8:31           ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-13 15:39             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-13 16:27               ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-13 23:13                 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-16 11:38                   ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 11:36                   ` Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2017-01-16 15:38                 ` Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup Roger Pau Monné
2017-01-16 15:39                   ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-12 18:24         ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 17:06 ` [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 16:23   ` [linux-linus bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 osstest service owner
2017-01-19 18:05     ` [linux-linus bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 18:44       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-20 11:09         ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-20 16:29           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-20 16:59             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 18:07   ` [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 19:09     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 19:15       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 20:37         ` Julien Grall
2017-01-19 21:01           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-20 12:06           ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-23 12:16             ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-23 14:31               ` Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1483608825465.37527@citrix.com \
    --to=anshul.makkar@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).