From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: "Juergen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>,
"Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:50:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484225411.32021.214.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <460a7b9d-69ae-358a-e9c0-adff42c01457@oracle.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1479 bytes --]
On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 22:13 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 09:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 08:52:03PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > wrote:
> > > I was trying to bootup on an 30 CPU machine (15 core, SMT).
> > >
> > > It works just fine with credit1 (see further down the log)
> > > but if I try credit2 it ends up hanging during bootup.
> > >
> > > I am a going to naively assume it is due to how the vCPUs are
> > > exposed (Where they match the physical CPUs under credit1),
> > > but under credit2 they are different.
> >
> > It seems now that I took dom0_max_vcpus out of the picture I can
> > reproduce this with credit1 scheduler. So it looks like an Linux
> > issue.
> >
> > Boris, any ideas? This is 4.9.
> >
>
> I think 4.9 is broken. There were changes in topology initialization
> that broke Xen in early 4.9 RCs.
>
Maybe it's me misremembering/saying stupid things, but I recall that at
some point we were testing some of the recent and in development Linux
branches in OSSTest.
I don't think we do that any longer, and that may be part of the reason
why we missed this one?
Ian, Wei, thoughts?
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 15:05 [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2017-01-05 1:52 ` Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-01-05 2:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05 8:39 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-05 9:33 ` Anshul Makkar
2017-01-05 2:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-01-05 3:13 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-06 15:55 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-12 12:50 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2017-01-12 16:22 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-12 16:41 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-12 18:27 ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-13 3:20 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-13 8:31 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-13 15:39 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-13 16:27 ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-13 23:13 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-16 11:38 ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 11:36 ` Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2017-01-16 15:38 ` Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup Roger Pau Monné
2017-01-16 15:39 ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-12 18:24 ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 17:06 ` [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 16:23 ` [linux-linus bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 osstest service owner
2017-01-19 18:05 ` [linux-linus bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 18:44 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-20 11:09 ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-20 16:29 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-20 16:59 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 18:07 ` [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 19:09 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 19:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 20:37 ` Julien Grall
2017-01-19 21:01 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-20 12:06 ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-23 12:16 ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-23 14:31 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1484225411.32021.214.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=wei.liu@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).