From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:31:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1484296261.9947.27.camel@citrix.com> References: <20170105015203.GA11785@char.us.oracle.com> <20170105021046.GB11785@char.us.oracle.com> <460a7b9d-69ae-358a-e9c0-adff42c01457@oracle.com> <1484225411.32021.214.camel@citrix.com> <944bfc67-32bd-f63b-c737-cfaaeb11494a@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7655763010687785469==" Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta6.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRxGR-0006KS-FB for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:31:11 +0000 In-Reply-To: <944bfc67-32bd-f63b-c737-cfaaeb11494a@oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Boris Ostrovsky , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Juergen =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gro=DF?= , Ian Jackson , Wei Liu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============7655763010687785469== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Gs9tDxt0ljmGv+mUKIcu" --=-Gs9tDxt0ljmGv+mUKIcu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 11:22 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 01/12/2017 07:50 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > I don't think we do that any longer, and that may be part of the > > reason > > why we missed this one? >=20 > I believe you needed to be on a multi-socket system to catch this > bug. > That's why, for example, my tests missed it --- the boxes that I use > are > all single-node. >=20 Which will happen in OSSTest in most cases, as we don't usually use dom0_max_vcpus, AFAICR. But I think the point here is really what Ian was asking. I.e., leaving aside the specific characteristic of this very issue, do you (and Juergen and Konrad) think it would be useful to have OSSTest smoke test upstream-ish kernel again? I think it is you, Xen-Linux people, that may find it helpful, as it may save you some local testing, etc. But this is only true if you think it could fit in your workflow to check its output and deal with it, which is something only you can tell. :-) If the answer is no, then nevermind, and sorry for the noise. :-D Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-Gs9tDxt0ljmGv+mUKIcu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJYeJBFAAoJEBZCeImluHPuBtcQAMkpnIou1R1fNVQbYw8T+l+I HqqrDBhQkpRrZy5v6YzWZ+OGhSi7knQV5/sS+BOnV4tRCCk3128s1cKYXVn2zSKA 10cbeHErT8an/Em1DjuMujzaXS2/RcJaD9EArfQAJKGSmTzfx2wePJ2aOKVyXQzC Y4WeuCiGaPpJ8BRqeroyzxKADT+6D6mfmNk+XejtcXSo2Cf7sps2YMxx6hrv3ujp lQwvBun2nFuZjrscJ8SvyWSrvHdH36sgGmrUYjWwULBhoyzwBHb3MsWU7rLIkaVb GrFJGu4CDVqtixoej38zUX9QS5w7qfrbcp0CTxNZi2LQkaMliNPBpOqvErncr/yv 94R1F7UyzIUpwBOhncEwSbspzngxLKmlMHx8i/MEYUsYF8sSsmaTGyyxGHocj6Lo XReW8VjeX90ZrD0XQ5mXqkEKdoHX11EhaFLKrMBhesoHtD4lwX16MN7R3O7EKG1t Ns+gPY0ZE2eG8zb9d27UECqFgtHvjPXJ55OXX5luMq5VDK5fBtrjASQiZebV7gXS oN8jnn5RF4DvXUkmBUXZzJugnmOCSbnKT/ryvQoc2iJFYa9Ll1lziV/J0v6fMOlb g6UskuXkXCmc5S68/8RvNeDhhBMpi7PxJTVqbPa2CiElpTP2fujNGd+g0hTjd2Eu 5tVuGHmbt1fgYKnymuDh =Rh0D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Gs9tDxt0ljmGv+mUKIcu-- --===============7655763010687785469== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLnhlbi5v cmcveGVuLWRldmVsCg== --===============7655763010687785469==--