xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: xen/arm: Domain not fully destroyed when using credit2
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:00:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485360009.32103.125.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c19de52-e7f5-b97a-ec31-41b4284add32@arm.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2679 bytes --]

On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 12:38 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Dario,
> 
Hey,

> On 25/01/17 11:10, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > My point was that, still from scheduling perspective, neither
> > Credit1
> > nor Credit2 sets a wakeup timer for idle pCPUs.
> > 
> > Well, in Credit1, the master_ticker timer is never stopped (while,
> > e.g., the per-pCPU tick is stopped before entering deep sleep,
> > via sched_tick_suspend(), see commit 964fae8ac), but that's only 1
> > pCPU.
> 
> The function sched_tick_suspend is never called on ARM. The power
> saving 
> in Xen ARM is still very limited and this would need to be updated
> in 
> the future.
> 
> So I guess that's why I still see interrupt coming on the idle pCPU
> when 
> credit1 is used. 
>
Yes. If you don't suspend the tick before going to wfi/hlt/whatever,
there will be a timer firing --and AFAICT waking you up from the low
power state-- every 10ms (with default Credit1 timeslice), even for
idle pCPUs.

> Looking at credit2, the callback tick_suspend is not 
> called. Does it mean there is no per-pCPU timer?
> 
Exactly, we (happily) don't need that in Credit2. :-)

> Now, from my understanding, if we decide to call sched_tick_suspend
> on 
> ARM before idling. We will likely have the same problem with credit1 
> because there is no more interrupt to wake-up the pCPU.
> 
Basing on what you've said so far in this thread, I tend to think that,
yes, that would be the case.

> But I don't think this is an issue in the scheduler. 
>
Agreed.

> IHMO, the problem 
> is in the RCU. Indeed a CPU in lower power mode (i.e  wfi on ARM or 
> pm_idle on x86 is been executed) will never get out to tell to the
> RCU : 
> "I am quiet, go ahead". So the RCU will never be able to reclaim the 
> memory and will result on a memory exhaustion if the pCPU never
> receive 
> an interrupt (this could happen if pCPU has never ran a guest).
> 
> The question now, is how to fix it?
> 
And a good one. I may be wrong (I certainly wasn't around at the time),
but ISTR out RCU code is imported/inspired by Linux... Looking there
again may help, but, nowadays, Linux RCU subsystem is a Lernaean Hydra
monster, with 100 heads and sharpen claws! :-O

And, while, in there, it has to be like that, I don't think we need all
such complexity, and hence we can't just re-sync. :-/

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-25 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-23 19:42 xen/arm: Domain not fully destroyed when using credit2 Julien Grall
2017-01-24  0:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-01-24 12:52   ` Julien Grall
2017-01-24  8:20 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-24 10:50   ` Julien Grall
2017-01-24 11:02     ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-24 12:30       ` Julien Grall
2017-01-24 12:53     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-24 13:04       ` Julien Grall
2017-01-24 13:05         ` Julien Grall
2017-01-24 13:19         ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-24 13:24           ` Julien Grall
2017-01-24 13:40             ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-24 13:49               ` Julien Grall
2017-01-24 14:16                 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-24 15:06                   ` Julien Grall
2017-01-25 11:10                     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-25 12:38                       ` Julien Grall
2017-01-25 12:40                         ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-25 14:23                           ` Julien Grall
2017-01-25 16:00                         ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2017-01-31 16:30                           ` Julien Grall
2017-01-31 22:10                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-02-01 18:21                             ` Wei Liu
2017-02-02 11:22                               ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-02 11:53                                 ` Wei Liu
2017-02-02 12:18                                   ` Julien Grall
2017-02-02 12:51                                     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-02-02 13:26                                       ` Julien Grall
2017-02-02 13:32                                         ` Dario Faggioli
2017-03-28 18:30                                           ` Julien Grall
2017-03-30  7:38                                             ` Dario Faggioli
2017-02-02 12:01                                 ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1485360009.32103.125.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).