From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xen/arm64: Don't zero BSS when booting using EFI
Date: Thu,  2 Feb 2017 19:25:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486063532-12288-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@arm.com> (raw)
Commit 146786b "efi: create efi_enabled()" introduced a variable
efi_flags stored in BSS and used to pass information between the stub
and Xen. However on ARM, BSS is zeroed after the stub has finished to
run and before Xen is started. This means that the bits set in efi_flags
will be lost.
We were not affected before because all the variables used to pass
information between Xen and the stub are living in initdata or data.
Looking at the description of the field SizeOfRawData in the PE/COFF
header (see [1]):
"If this is less than VirtualSize, the remainder of the section is
zero-filled. Because the SizeOfRawData field is rounded but the
VirtualSize field is not, it is possible for SizeOfRawData to be greater
than VirtualSize as well. When a section contains only uninitialized
data, this field should be zero."
Both VirtualSize and SizeOfRawData are correctly set in the header (see
arch/arm/arm64/head.S) so the EFI firmware will zero BSS for us.
Therefore we don't need to zero BSS before running the EFI stub and can
skip the one between the EFI stub and Xen.
To avoid another branch instruction, slightly refactor the code. The
register x26 is allocated to hold whether BSS is skipped. The value will
be:
    - 0 when the code is running on CPU0 and EFI is not used
    - 1 when EFI is used or running on other processor than the boot one.
[1] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms680547(v=vs.85).aspx
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
    This patch fix ACPI boot on Xen ARM. Without it Xen thinks it is not
    running on EFI and will not try to find the RDSP.
---
 xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S
index 3f63d2a..8cb4602 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
  *  x23 - UART address
  *  x24 - cpuid
  *  x25 - identity map in place
- *  x26 -
+ *  x26 - skip_zero_bss
  *  x27 -
  *  x28 -
  *  x29 -
@@ -232,6 +232,10 @@ section_table:
         .long   0xe0500020       /* Characteristics (section flags) */
         .align  5
 real_start:
+        /* BSS should be zeroed when booting with efi */
+        mov   x26, #0                /* x26 := skip_zero_bss */
+
+real_start_efi:
         msr   DAIFSet, 0xf           /* Disable all interrupts */
 
         /* Save the bootloader arguments in less-clobberable registers */
@@ -261,6 +265,8 @@ GLOBAL(init_secondary)
         sub   x20, x19, x0           /* x20 := phys-offset */
 
         mov   x22, #1                /* x22 := is_secondary_cpu */
+        /* Skip zero BSS on secondary CPUs to avoid nasty surprises. */
+        mov   x26, #1                /* X26 := skip_zero_bss */
 
 common_start:
         mov   x24, #0                /* x24 := CPU ID. Initialy zero until we
@@ -314,8 +320,8 @@ common_start:
 
 el2:    PRINT("- Xen starting at EL2 -\r\n")
 
-        /* Zero BSS On the boot CPU to avoid nasty surprises */
-        cbnz  x22, skip_bss
+        /* Zero BSS only when requested to avoid nasty surprises. */
+        cbnz  x26, skip_bss
 
         PRINT("- Zero BSS -\r\n")
         ldr   x0, =__bss_start       /* Load start & end of bss */
@@ -787,7 +793,16 @@ ENTRY(efi_xen_start)
         mov   x1, xzr
         mov   x2, xzr
         mov   x3, xzr
-        b     real_start
+        /*
+         * The EFI stub and Xen may share some information living in
+         * BSS. Don't zero BSS to avoid loosing them.
+         *
+         * Note that the EFI firmware has already zeroed BSS for us
+         * before jump into the stub.
+         */
+        mov   x26, #1               /* x26 := skip_zero_bss */
+
+        b     real_start_efi
 ENDPROC(efi_xen_start)
 
 /*
-- 
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next             reply	other threads:[~2017-02-02 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-02 19:25 Julien Grall [this message]
2017-02-02 23:19 ` [PATCH] xen/arm64: Don't zero BSS when booting using EFI Daniel Kiper
2017-02-02 23:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-02-02 23:29   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-03 19:11   ` Julien Grall
2017-02-03 19:14     ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-02-03 19:16       ` Julien Grall
2017-02-03  7:41 ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-03 14:24   ` Julien Grall
2017-02-03 14:31     ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-03 14:35       ` Julien Grall
2017-02-03 14:56         ` Jan Beulich
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-08 10:48 Julien Grall
2017-02-08 12:10 ` Daniel Kiper
2017-02-08 23:31 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1486063532-12288-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).