xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [xen-4.7-testing test] 105948: regressions - FAIL
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:59:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487757588.6732.428.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58AD5DDA020000780013C9ED@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2636 bytes --]

On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 01:46 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 22.02.17 at 01:02, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> > (XEN) Xen call trace:
> > (XEN)    [<ffff82d080126e70>]
> > sched_credit2.c#vcpu_is_migrateable+0x22/0x9a
> > (XEN)    [<ffff82d080129763>]
> > sched_credit2.c#csched2_schedule+0x823/0xb4e
> > (XEN)    [<ffff82d08012c17e>] schedule.c#schedule+0x108/0x609
> > (XEN)    [<ffff82d08012f8bd>] softirq.c#__do_softirq+0x7f/0x8a
> > (XEN)    [<ffff82d08012f912>] do_softirq+0x13/0x15
> > (XEN)    [<ffff82d080164b17>] domain.c#idle_loop+0x55/0x62
> > (XEN)
> > (XEN)
> > (XEN) ****************************************
> > (XEN) Panic on CPU 14:
> > (XEN) Assertion 'd->cpupool != NULL' failed at
> > ...5948.build-amd64/xen/xen/include/xen/sched-if.h:200
> > (XEN) ****************************************
> > (XEN)
> > (XEN) Manual reset required ('noreboot' specified)
> > 
> > I am guessing the most recent credit2 backports weren't quite so
> > safe?
> 
> Well, there was only one in the batch under test (and that is what
> adds the cpupool_domain_cpumask() causing the ASSERT() above
> to trigger). However, comparing with the staging version of the file
> (which is heavily different), the immediate code involved here isn't
> all that different, so I wonder whether (a) this is a problem on
> staging too or (b) we're missing another backport.
>
Yeah, I also wonder in which of these two situations we are. Staging
looks fine, as far as my testing goes, and also according, e.g., to:

http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105946/test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2/info.html

Or:

http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105900/test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2/info.html

There appear to have been a problem, in a different test step, though,
here:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105919/test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2/info.html

Which I noticed yesterday afternoon and am currently looking into it,
because I don't see what has actually gone wrong.

Also, looking at the history of Credit2 tests in 4.7-testing:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2/xen-4.7-testing

Things were fine on 2017-02-16, and have started failing 2017-02-20.

>  Dario?
> 
I will investigate.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-22 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 23:45 [xen-4.7-testing test] 105948: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2017-02-22  0:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-22  8:46   ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-22  9:59     ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2017-02-23 23:25     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-02-24 16:14     ` RFC/PATCH: xen: race during domain destruction [Re: [xen-4.7-testing test] 105948: regressions - FAIL] Dario Faggioli
2017-02-26 15:53       ` Dario Faggioli
2017-02-27 15:18         ` Dario Faggioli
2017-02-28  9:48           ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1487757588.6732.428.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).