xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: julien.grall@arm.com
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, dario.faggioli@citrix.com,
	sstabellini@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] xen/arm: introduce vwfi parameter
Date: Wed,  1 Mar 2017 11:43:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488397395-3101-1-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org> (raw)

Introduce new Xen command line parameter called "vwfi", which stands for
virtual wfi. The default is "trap": Xen traps guest wfi and wfe
instructions. In the case of wfi, Xen calls vcpu_block on the guest
vcpu; in the case of guest wfe, Xen calls vcpu_yield on the guest vcpu.
The behavior can be changed by setting vwfi to "native", in that case
Xen doesn't trap neither wfi nor wfe, running them in guest context.

The result is strong reduction in irq latency (from 5000ns to 2000ns,
measured using https://github.com/edgarigl/tbm, the physical timer, and
1 pcpu dedicated to 1 vcpu). The downside is that the scheduler thinks
that the guest is busy when actually is sleeping, leading to suboptimal
scheduling decisions.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
CC: dario.faggioli@citrix.com

---
Changes in v4:
- improve wording in the docs

Changes in v3:
- do the same for wfe
---
 docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown | 15 +++++++++++++++
 xen/arch/arm/traps.c                | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown
index c0106fb..89209b4 100644
--- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown
+++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown
@@ -1638,6 +1638,21 @@ Note that if **watchdog** option is also specified vpmu will be turned off.
 As the virtualisation is not 100% safe, don't use the vpmu flag on
 production systems (see http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-163.html)!
 
+### vwfi
+> `= trap | native
+
+> Default: `trap`
+
+WFI is the ARM instruction to "wait for interrupt". WFE is similar and
+means "wait for event". This option, which is ARM specific, changes the
+way guest WFI and WFE are implemented in Xen. By default, Xen traps both
+instructions. In the case of WFI, Xen blocks the guest vcpu; in the case
+of WFE, Xen yield the guest vcpu. When setting vwfi to `native`, Xen
+doesn't trap either instruction, running them in guest context. Setting
+vwfi to `native` reduces irq latency significantly. It can also lead to
+suboptimal scheduling decisions, but only when the system is
+oversubscribed (i.e., in total there are more vCPUs than pCPUs).
+
 ### watchdog
 > `= force | <boolean>`
 
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c
index 4f96a2b..8117bd5 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c
@@ -102,6 +102,19 @@ static int debug_stack_lines = 40;
 
 integer_param("debug_stack_lines", debug_stack_lines);
 
+static enum {
+	TRAP,
+	NATIVE,
+} vwfi;
+
+static void __init parse_vwfi(const char *s)
+{
+	if ( !strcmp(s, "native") )
+		vwfi = NATIVE;
+	else
+		vwfi = TRAP;
+}
+custom_param("vwfi", parse_vwfi);
 
 void init_traps(void)
 {
@@ -128,8 +141,8 @@ void init_traps(void)
 
     /* Setup hypervisor traps */
     WRITE_SYSREG(HCR_PTW|HCR_BSU_INNER|HCR_AMO|HCR_IMO|HCR_FMO|HCR_VM|
-                 HCR_TWE|HCR_TWI|HCR_TSC|HCR_TAC|HCR_SWIO|HCR_TIDCP|HCR_FB,
-                 HCR_EL2);
+                 (vwfi != NATIVE ? (HCR_TWI|HCR_TWE) : 0) |
+                 HCR_TSC|HCR_TAC|HCR_SWIO|HCR_TIDCP|HCR_FB,HCR_EL2);
     isb();
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-01 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-01 19:43 Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2017-03-03 16:35 ` [PATCH v4] xen/arm: introduce vwfi parameter Julien Grall
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-01 20:13 Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1488397395-3101-1-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).