xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: julien.grall@arm.com
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, sstabellini@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/3] xen/arm: vgic_migrate_irq: do not race against GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING
Date: Wed,  1 Mar 2017 14:15:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488406545-26164-3-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488406545-26164-1-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org>

A potential race condition occurs when vgic_migrate_irq is called a
second time, while GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING is already set. In that case,
vgic_migrate_irq takes a different vgic lock from gic_update_one_lr.
vgic_migrate_irq running concurrently with gic_update_one_lr could cause
data corruptions, as they both access the inflight list.

This patch fixes this problem. In vgic_migrate_irq after setting the new
vcpu target, it checks both GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING and
GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE. If they are both set we can just return because
we have already set the new target: when gic_update_one_lr reaches
the GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING test, it will do the right thing.

Otherwise, if GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING is set but GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE
is not, gic_update_one_lr is running at the very same time on another
pcpu, so it just waits until it completes (GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING is
cleared).

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
---
 xen/arch/arm/gic.c  |  5 ++++-
 xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
index 16bb150..a805300 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
@@ -508,10 +508,13 @@ static void gic_update_one_lr(struct vcpu *v, int i)
              * next pcpu, inflight is already cleared. No concurrent
              * accesses to inflight. */
             smp_mb();
-            if ( test_and_clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) )
+            if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) )
             {
                 struct vcpu *v_target = vgic_get_target_vcpu(v, irq);
                 irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(v_target->processor));
+                /* Set the new affinity, then clear MIGRATING. */
+                smp_mb();
+                clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status);
             }
         }
     }
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
index a323e7e..9141b34 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
@@ -252,13 +252,25 @@ void vgic_migrate_irq(struct vcpu *old, struct vcpu *new,
     spin_lock_irqsave(&old->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
     write_atomic(t_vcpu, new->vcpu_id);
 
-    /* migration already in progress, no need to do anything */
-    if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) )
+    /* Set the new target, then check MIGRATING and VISIBLE, it pairs
+     * with the barrier in gic_update_one_lr. */
+    smp_mb();
+
+    /* no need to do anything, gic_update_one_lr will take care of it */
+    if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) &&
+         test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status) )
     {
         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
         return;
     }
 
+    /* gic_update_one_lr is currently running, wait until its completion */
+    while ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) )
+    {
+        cpu_relax();
+        smp_rmb();
+    }
+
     if ( list_empty(&p->inflight) )
     {
         irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(new->processor));
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-01 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-01 22:15 [PATCH v5 0/3] xen/arm: remove race conditions in irq migration Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-01 22:15 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] arm: remove irq from inflight, then change physical affinity Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-01 22:15   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] xen/arm: move setting of new target vcpu to vgic_migrate_irq Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-03 17:38     ` Julien Grall
2017-03-29 23:48       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-31 15:29         ` Julien Grall
2017-03-01 22:15   ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2017-03-03 17:47     ` [PATCH v5 3/3] xen/arm: vgic_migrate_irq: do not race against GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING Julien Grall
2017-03-29 23:47       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-31 16:02         ` Julien Grall
2017-03-31 20:24           ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-03 11:03             ` Julien Grall
2017-04-03 21:24               ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-01 23:24   ` [PATCH v5 1/3] arm: remove irq from inflight, then change physical affinity Julien Grall
2017-03-03 17:04     ` Julien Grall
2017-03-03 19:34       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-03 19:38         ` Julien Grall
2017-03-22 23:59           ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1488406545-26164-3-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).