xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] xen: credit1: increase efficiency and scalability of load balancing.
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:35:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488454512.5548.191.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57001cc1-de50-eea3-da2c-737b27981c1b@citrix.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1854 bytes --]

On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 11:06 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/03/17 10:38, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> > ---
> > Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>  
> Malcolm’s solution to this problem is https://github.com/xenserver/xe
> n-4.7.pg/commit/0f830b9f229fa6472accc9630ad16cfa42258966  This has
> been in 2 releases of XenServer now, and has a very visible
> improvement for aggregate multi-queue multi-vm intrahost network
> performance (although I can't find the numbers right now).
> 
Yep, as you know, I had become aware of that.

> The root of the performance problems is that pcpu_schedule_trylock()
> is expensive even for the local case, while cross-cpu locking is much
> worse.  Locking every single pcpu in turn is terribly expensive, in
> terms of hot cacheline pingpong, and the lock is frequently
> contended.
> 
> As a first opinion of this patch, you are adding another cpumask
> which is going to play hot cacheline pingpong.
> 
Can you clarify? Inside csched_load_balance(), I'm actually trading one
currently existing cpumask_and() with another.

Sure this new mask needs updating, but that only happens when a pCPUs
acquires or leaves the "overloaded" status.

Malcom's patch uses an atomic counter which does not fit very well in
Credit1's load balancer's logic, and in fact it (potentially) requires
an additional cpumask_cycle(). And it also comes with cache coherency
implications, doesn't it?

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-02 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-02 10:37 [PATCH 0/6] xen: sched: improve scalability of Credit1, and optimize a bit both Credit1 and Credit2 Dario Faggioli
2017-03-02 10:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] xen: credit1: simplify csched_runq_steal() a little bit Dario Faggioli
2017-03-03  9:35   ` anshul makkar
2017-03-03 13:39     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-03-02 10:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] xen: credit: (micro) optimize csched_runq_steal() Dario Faggioli
2017-03-03  9:48   ` anshul makkar
2017-03-03 13:53     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-03-02 10:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] xen: credit1: increase efficiency and scalability of load balancing Dario Faggioli
2017-03-02 11:06   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-02 11:35     ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2017-04-06  7:37     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-03-02 10:38 ` [PATCH 4/6] xen: credit1: treat pCPUs more evenly during balancing Dario Faggioli
2017-03-02 10:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] xen/tools: tracing: add record for credit1 runqueue stealing Dario Faggioli
2017-03-02 10:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] xen: credit2: avoid cpumask_any() in pick_cpu() Dario Faggioli
2017-03-02 10:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] xen: sched: improve scalability of Credit1, and optimize a bit both Credit1 and Credit2 Dario Faggioli
2017-03-27  9:08 ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1488454512.5548.191.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).