xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/emul: Hold x86_emulate() to strict X86EMUL_EXCEPTION requirements
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:59:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488466778-10163-2-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488466778-10163-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

All known paths raising faults behind the back of the emulator have fixed.
Reinstate the original intended assertion concerning the behaviour of
X86EMUL_EXCEPTION and ctxt->event_pending.

As x86_emulate_wrapper() now covers both PV and HVM guests properly, there is
no need for the PV assertions following calls to x86_emulate().

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/mm.c                      |  6 ------
 xen/arch/x86/traps.c                   |  3 ---
 xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c | 15 +++++----------
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
index 1661e66..7bc951d 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
@@ -5420,9 +5420,6 @@ int ptwr_do_page_fault(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long addr,
     page_unlock(page);
     put_page(page);
 
-    /* More strict than x86_emulate_wrapper(), as this is now true for PV. */
-    ASSERT(ptwr_ctxt.ctxt.event_pending == (rc == X86EMUL_EXCEPTION));
-
     switch ( rc )
     {
     case X86EMUL_EXCEPTION:
@@ -5574,9 +5571,6 @@ int mmio_ro_do_page_fault(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long addr,
     else
         rc = x86_emulate(&ctxt, &mmio_ro_emulate_ops);
 
-    /* More strict than x86_emulate_wrapper(), as this is now true for PV. */
-    ASSERT(ctxt.event_pending == (rc == X86EMUL_EXCEPTION));
-
     switch ( rc )
     {
     case X86EMUL_EXCEPTION:
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
index 8ba7ed0..cffbf0e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
@@ -3003,9 +3003,6 @@ static int emulate_privileged_op(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
     regs->eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_IF;
     regs->eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_IOPL;
 
-    /* More strict than x86_emulate_wrapper(). */
-    ASSERT(ctxt.ctxt.event_pending == (rc == X86EMUL_EXCEPTION));
-
     switch ( rc )
     {
     case X86EMUL_OKAY:
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
index a65026a..b4889b7 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
@@ -6298,17 +6298,12 @@ int x86_emulate_wrapper(
         ASSERT(ctxt->regs->r(ip) == orig_ip);
 
     /*
-     * TODO: Make this true:
-     *
-    ASSERT(ctxt->event_pending == (rc == X86EMUL_EXCEPTION));
-     *
-     * Some codepaths still raise exceptions behind the back of the
-     * emulator. (i.e. return X86EMUL_EXCEPTION but without
-     * event_pending being set).  In the meantime, use a slightly
-     * relaxed check...
+     * An event being pending should exactly match returning
+     * X86EMUL_EXCEPTION.  (If this trips, the chances are a codepath has
+     * called hvm_inject_hw_exception() rather than using
+     * x86_emul_hw_exception().)
      */
-    if ( ctxt->event_pending )
-        ASSERT(rc == X86EMUL_EXCEPTION);
+    ASSERT(ctxt->event_pending == (rc == X86EMUL_EXCEPTION));
 
     return rc;
 }
-- 
2.1.4


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-02 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-02 14:59 [PATCH 1/2] x86/hvm: Don't raise #GP behind the emulators back for CR accesses Andrew Cooper
2017-03-02 14:59 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2017-03-03 10:18   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/emul: Hold x86_emulate() to strict X86EMUL_EXCEPTION requirements Jan Beulich
2017-03-02 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/hvm: Don't raise #GP behind the emulators back for CR accesses Paul Durrant
2017-03-02 16:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-03-03  8:02 ` Tian, Kevin
2017-03-03 10:16 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 10:30   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-03 10:36     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1488466778-10163-2-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).