xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Praveen Kumar <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com,
	Praveen Kumar <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/2] xen: credit2: flexible configuration of runqueues
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 23:56:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489170396-22611-1-git-send-email-kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com> (raw)

The idea is to give user more flexibility to configure runqueue further.
For most workloads and in most systems, using per-core means have too many
small runqueues. Using per-socket is almost always better, but it may result
in too few big runqueues.

OPTION 1 :
--------
The user can create runqueue per-cpu using Xen boot parameter like below:

 credit2_runqueue=cpu

which would mean the following:
 - pCPU 0 belong to runqueue 0
 - pCPU 1 belong to runqueue 1
 - pCPU 2 belong to runqueue 2
 and so on.

OPTION 2 :
--------
Further user can be allowed to say something shown below :

 credit2_runqueue=0,1,4,5;2,3,6,7;8,9,12,13;10,11,14,15

or (with exactly the same meaning, but a perhaps more clear syntax):

 credit2_runqueue=[[0,1,4,5][2,3,6,7][8,9,12,13][10,11,14,15]]

which would mean the following:
 - pCPUs 0, 1, 4 and 5 belong to runqueue 0
 - pCPUs 2, 3, 6 and 7 belong to runqueue 1
 - pCPUs 8, 9, 12 and 13 belong to runqueue 2
 - pCPUs 10, 11, 14 and 15 belong to runqueue 3

---
PATCH 1/2 enables to create runqueue per-cpu [OPTION 1].
---

Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com>

---
diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c
index af457c1..2bc0013 100644
--- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c
+++ b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c
@@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ integer_param("credit2_balance_over", opt_overload_balance_tolerance);
  * want that to happen basing on topology. At the moment, it is possible
  * to choose to arrange runqueues to be:
  *
+ * - per-cpu: meaning that there will be one runqueue per logical cpu. This
+ *            will happen when if the opt_runqueue parameter is set to 'cpu'.
+ *
  * - per-core: meaning that there will be one runqueue per each physical
  *             core of the host. This will happen if the opt_runqueue
  *             parameter is set to 'core';
@@ -322,11 +325,13 @@ integer_param("credit2_balance_over", opt_overload_balance_tolerance);
  * either the same physical core, the same physical socket, the same NUMA
  * node, or just all of them, will be put together to form runqueues.
  */
-#define OPT_RUNQUEUE_CORE   0
-#define OPT_RUNQUEUE_SOCKET 1
-#define OPT_RUNQUEUE_NODE   2
-#define OPT_RUNQUEUE_ALL    3
+#define OPT_RUNQUEUE_CPU    0
+#define OPT_RUNQUEUE_CORE   1
+#define OPT_RUNQUEUE_SOCKET 2
+#define OPT_RUNQUEUE_NODE   3
+#define OPT_RUNQUEUE_ALL    4
 static const char *const opt_runqueue_str[] = {
+    [OPT_RUNQUEUE_CPU] = "cpu",
     [OPT_RUNQUEUE_CORE] = "core",
     [OPT_RUNQUEUE_SOCKET] = "socket",
     [OPT_RUNQUEUE_NODE] = "node",
@@ -682,6 +687,8 @@ cpu_to_runqueue(struct csched2_private *prv, unsigned int cpu)
         BUG_ON(cpu_to_socket(cpu) == XEN_INVALID_SOCKET_ID ||
                cpu_to_socket(peer_cpu) == XEN_INVALID_SOCKET_ID);
 
+        if (opt_runqueue == OPT_RUNQUEUE_CPU)
+            continue;
         if ( opt_runqueue == OPT_RUNQUEUE_ALL ||
              (opt_runqueue == OPT_RUNQUEUE_CORE && same_core(peer_cpu, cpu)) ||
              (opt_runqueue == OPT_RUNQUEUE_SOCKET && same_socket(peer_cpu, cpu)) ||

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-10 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-10 18:26 Praveen Kumar [this message]
2017-03-22 14:17 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] xen: credit2: flexible configuration of runqueues Dario Faggioli
2017-03-22 14:24 ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1489170396-22611-1-git-send-email-kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --to=kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).