xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com,
	he.chen@linux.intel.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com,
	Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
	mengxu@cis.upenn.edu, jbeulich@suse.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 03/25] x86: refactor psr: implement main data structures.
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 19:07:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489662495-5375-4-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489662495-5375-1-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>

To construct an extendible framework, we need analyze PSR features
and abstract the common things and feature specific things. Then,
encapsulate them into different data structures.

By analyzing PSR features, we can get below map.
                +------+------+------+
      --------->| Dom0 | Dom1 | ...  |
      |         +------+------+------+
      |            |
      |Dom ID      | cos_id of domain
      |            V
      |        +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
User --------->| PSR                                                                         |
     Socket ID |  +--------------+---------------+---------------+                           |
               |  | Socket0 Info | Socket 1 Info |    ...        |                           |
               |  +--------------+---------------+---------------+                           |
               |    |                   cos_id=0               cos_id=1          ...         |
               |    |          +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------+ |
               |    |->Ref   : |         ref 0         |         ref 1         | ...       | |
               |    |          +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------+ |
               |    |          +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------+ |
               |    |->L3 CAT: |         cos 0         |         cos 1         | ...       | |
               |    |          +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------+ |
               |    |          +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------+ |
               |    |->L2 CAT: |         cos 0         |         cos 1         | ...       | |
               |    |          +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------+ |
               |    |          +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ |
               |    |->CDP   : | cos0 code | cos0 data | cos1 code | cos1 data | ...       | |
               |               +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ |
               +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

So, we need define a socket info data structure, 'struct
psr_socket_info' to manage information per socket. It contains a
reference count array according to COS ID and a feature array to
manage all features enabled. Every entry of the reference count
array is used to record how many domains are using the COS registers
according to the COS ID. For example, L3 CAT and L2 CAT are enabled,
Dom1 uses COS_ID=1 registers of both features to save CBM values, like
below.
        +-------+-------+-------+-----+
        | COS 0 | COS 1 | COS 2 | ... |
        +-------+-------+-------+-----+
L3 CAT  | 0x7ff | 0x1ff | ...   | ... |
        +-------+-------+-------+-----+
L2 CAT  | 0xff  | 0xff  | ...   | ... |
        +-------+-------+-------+-----+

If Dom2 has same CBM values, it can reuse these registers which COS_ID=1.
That means, both Dom1 and Dom2 use same COS registers(ID=1) to save same
L3/L2 values. So, the value ref[1] is 2 which means 2 domains are using
COS_ID 1.

To manage a feature, we need define a feature node data structure,
'struct feat_node', to manage feature's specific HW info, its callback
functions (all feature's specific behaviors are encapsulated into these
callback functions), and an array of all COS registers values of this
feature.

CDP is a special feature which uses two entries of the array
for one COS ID. So, the number of CDP COS registers is the half of L3
CAT. E.g. L3 CAT has 16 COS registers, then CDP has 8 COS registers if
it is enabled. CDP uses the COS registers array as below.

                         +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
CDP cos_reg_val[] index: |     0     |     1     |     2     |     3     |    ...    |
                         +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
                  value: | cos0 code | cos0 data | cos1 code | cos1 data |    ...    |
                         +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+

For more details, please refer SDM and patches to implement 'get value' and
'set value'.

Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
---
v9:
    - replace feature list to a feature pointer array.
      (suggested by Roger Pau)
    - add 'PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT' in 'enum psr_feat_type' to know features
      account.
      (suggested by Roger Pau)
    - move 'feat_ops' declaration into 'feat_node' structure.
      (suggested by Roger Pau)
    - directly use uninon for feature HW info and move its declaration into
      'feat_node' structure.
      (suggested by Roger Pau)
    - remove 'enum psr_feat_type feature' declared in 'feat_ops' because it is
      not useful after using feature pointer array.
      (suggested by Roger Pau)
    - rename 'l3_cat_info' to 'cat_info' to be used by all CAT/CDP features.
    - remove 'nr_feat' which is only for a record.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - add 'cos_num' to record how many COS registers are used by a feature in
      one time access.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - replace 'uint64_t' to 'uint32_t' for cbm value because SDM specifies the
      max 32 bits for it.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
v7:
    - sort inclusion files position.
      (suggested by Wei Liu)
v6:
    - make commit message be clearer.
      (suggested by Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk)
    - fix wordings.
      (suggested by Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk)
    - add comments to explain relationship between 'feat_mask' and
      'enum psr_feat_type'.
      (suggested by Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk)
v5:
    - remove section number.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
    - remove double blank.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
v4:
    - create this patch because of removing all old CAT/CDP codes to make
      implementation be more easily understood.
      (suggested by Jan Beulich)
---
 xen/arch/x86/psr.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
index 96a8589..822f1c0 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
@@ -13,16 +13,112 @@
  * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
  * more details.
  */
-#include <xen/init.h>
 #include <xen/cpu.h>
 #include <xen/err.h>
+#include <xen/init.h>
 #include <xen/sched.h>
 #include <asm/psr.h>
 
+/*
+ * Terminology:
+ * - CAT         Cache Allocation Technology
+ * - CBM         Capacity BitMasks
+ * - CDP         Code and Data Prioritization
+ * - COS/CLOS    Class of Service. Also mean COS registers.
+ * - COS_MAX     Max number of COS for the feature (minus 1)
+ * - MSRs        Machine Specific Registers
+ * - PSR         Intel Platform Shared Resource
+ */
+
 #define PSR_CMT        (1<<0)
 #define PSR_CAT        (1<<1)
 #define PSR_CDP        (1<<2)
 
+/*
+ * Per SDM chapter 'Cache Allocation Technology: Cache Mask Configuration',
+ * the MSRs ranging from 0C90H through 0D0FH (inclusive), enables support for
+ * up to 128 L3 CAT Classes of Service. The COS_ID=[0,127].
+ *
+ * The MSRs ranging from 0D10H through 0D4FH (inclusive), enables support for
+ * up to 64 L2 CAT COS. The COS_ID=[0,63].
+ *
+ * So, the maximum COS register count of one feature is 128.
+ */
+#define MAX_COS_REG_CNT  128
+
+enum psr_feat_type {
+    PSR_SOCKET_L3_CAT = 0,
+    PSR_SOCKET_L3_CDP,
+    PSR_SOCKET_L2_CAT,
+    PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT,
+};
+
+/* CAT/CDP HW info data structure. */
+struct psr_cat_hw_info {
+    unsigned int cbm_len;
+    unsigned int cos_max;
+};
+
+/*
+ * This structure represents one feature.
+ * feat_ops    - Feature operation callback functions.
+ * info        - Feature HW info.
+ * cos_reg_val - Array to store the values of COS registers. One entry stores
+ *               the value of one COS register.
+ *               For L3 CAT and L2 CAT, one entry corresponds to one COS_ID.
+ *               For CDP, two entries correspond to one COS_ID. E.g.
+ *               COS_ID=0 corresponds to cos_reg_val[0] (Data) and
+ *               cos_reg_val[1] (Code).
+ * cos_num     - COS registers number that feature uses in one time access.
+ */
+struct feat_node {
+    /*
+     * This structure defines feature operation callback functions. Every feature
+     * enabled MUST implement such callback functions and register them to ops.
+     *
+     * Feature specific behaviors will be encapsulated into these callback
+     * functions. Then, the main flows will not be changed when introducing a new
+     * feature.
+     */
+    struct feat_ops {
+        /* get_cos_max is used to get feature's cos_max. */
+        unsigned int (*get_cos_max)(const struct feat_node *feat);
+    } ops;
+
+    /* Encapsulate feature specific HW info here. */
+    union {
+        struct psr_cat_hw_info cat_info;
+    } info;
+
+    uint32_t cos_reg_val[MAX_COS_REG_CNT];
+    unsigned int cos_num;
+};
+
+/*
+ * PSR features are managed per socket. Below structure defines the members
+ * used to manage these features.
+ * feat_mask - Mask used to record features enabled on socket. There may be
+ *             some features enabled at same time.
+ * features  - An feature node array used to manage all features enabled.
+ * cos_ref   - A reference count array to record how many domains are using the
+ *             COS_ID.
+ *             Every entry of cos_ref corresponds to one COS ID.
+ * ref_lock  - A lock to protect cos_ref.
+ */
+struct psr_socket_info {
+    /*
+     * It maps to values defined in 'enum psr_feat_type' below. Value in 'enum
+     * psr_feat_type' means the bit position.
+     * bit 0:   L3 CAT
+     * bit 1:   L3 CDP
+     * bit 2:   L2 CAT
+     */
+    unsigned int feat_mask;
+    struct feat_node *features[PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT];
+    unsigned int cos_ref[MAX_COS_REG_CNT];
+    spinlock_t ref_lock;
+};
+
 struct psr_assoc {
     uint64_t val;
     uint64_t cos_mask;
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-16 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-16 11:07 [PATCH v9 00/25] Enable L2 Cache Allocation Technology & Refactor psr.c Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 01/25] docs: create Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) and Code and Data Prioritization (CDP) feature document Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 02/25] x86: refactor psr: remove L3 CAT/CDP codes Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:07 ` Yi Sun [this message]
2017-03-24 16:19   ` [PATCH v9 03/25] x86: refactor psr: implement main data structures Jan Beulich
2017-03-27  2:38     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27  6:20       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27  7:12         ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27  7:37           ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 04/25] x86: move cpuid_count_leaf from cpuid.c to processor.h Yi Sun
2017-03-24 16:22   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 05/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2017-03-24 16:52   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27  4:41     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27  6:34       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27  8:16         ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27  8:43           ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 06/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement Domain init/free and schedule flows Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 07/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27  9:07   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27 12:24     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27 12:51       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27 13:19         ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27 13:32           ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 08/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27  9:23   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27 12:59     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27 13:34       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  2:13         ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28  8:10           ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 09/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement framework Yi Sun
2017-03-27  9:59   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  1:21     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28  8:21       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 10/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: assemble features value array Yi Sun
2017-03-27 10:17   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  3:12     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28  8:05       ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28  8:36         ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  9:11           ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28  9:20             ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 10:18               ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 10:39                 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  8:34       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 10:12         ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 10:36           ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 11/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos finding flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 10:28   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  3:26     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28  8:41       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 12/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos id picking flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 10:37   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  4:58     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28  8:45       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 10:31         ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 10:40           ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 11:59             ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 12:20               ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-29  1:20                 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-29  1:36                   ` Yi Sun
2017-03-29  9:57                     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-30  1:37                       ` Yi Sun
2017-03-30  1:39                         ` Yi Sun
2017-03-30 11:55                         ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-30 12:10                           ` Yi Sun
2017-03-31  8:47                             ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31  9:12                               ` Yi Sun
2017-03-31  9:18                                 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-31 10:19                                 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 12:40                                   ` Yi Sun
2017-03-31 12:51                                     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 13:22                                       ` Yi Sun
2017-03-31 14:35                                         ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 14:46                                           ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 13/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement write msr flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 10:46   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  5:06     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28  8:48       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 10:20         ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 14/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 13:58   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 15/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 14:08   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  5:13     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 16/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 17/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement set value callback functions Yi Sun
2017-03-27 14:17   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  5:14     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 18/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 19/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 14:38   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28  5:16     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 20/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 14:39   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 21/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement set " Yi Sun
2017-03-27 14:40   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 22/25] tools: L2 CAT: support get HW info for L2 CAT Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 23/25] tools: L2 CAT: support show cbm " Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 24/25] tools: L2 CAT: support set " Yi Sun
2017-03-28 14:04   ` Wei Liu
2017-03-29  1:21     ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 25/25] docs: add L2 CAT description in docs Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:20 ` [PATCH v9 00/25] Enable L2 Cache Allocation Technology & Refactor psr.c Jan Beulich
2017-03-17  1:29   ` Yi Sun
2017-03-17  7:25     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1489662495-5375-4-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=he.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).