From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [xen-4.6-testing bisection] complete test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 19:23:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1491326625.18721.3.camel@citrix.com> References: <58E21DBB020000780014BE92@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7917619850358961250==" Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta6.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvSBP-0006jc-JC for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 17:23:55 +0000 In-Reply-To: <58E21DBB020000780014BE92@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel Cc: osstest-admin@xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============7917619850358961250== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yb1Y1aSXmXx6097B6Pq2" --=-yb1Y1aSXmXx6097B6Pq2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 02:02 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 03.04.17 at 00:44, wrote: > > =C2=A0 commit 7ff6d9fc19ef88d2ca3304a312c0e8a46b61f546 > > =C2=A0 Author: Dario Faggioli > > =C2=A0 Date:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Fri Mar 31 09:03:32 2017 +0200 > > =C2=A0=C2=A0 > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0xen: sched: don't call hooks of the= wrong scheduler via > > VCPU2OP >=20 > I must have completely screwed up on this backport, so I've simply > reverted it for now. I didn't look closely yet whether this is some > trivial oversight of mine, or whether perhaps it shouldn't have been > backported that far back in the first place. >=20 I had a look. The backport looks fine in itself to me. If I'm not mistaken, this is not in staging-4.6: f3d47501db2b7bb8dfd6a3c9710b7aff4b1fc55b xen: fix a (latent) cpupool-related race during domain destroy I can't be positive this is what's missing, but it's my best guess. :-) I also haven't tried backporting it, but I'm happy to. Let me know if I should. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-yb1Y1aSXmXx6097B6Pq2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJY49aiAAoJEBZCeImluHPutp4P+gLa28jBBk19wr6cLdQR+Elx 1+tw8G0+rkXo3VZf833WC54V/hxij8BX2nbKa90vEh2pc/eVqq07ysfK5CUd7k16 gtoEDQ6au0MTs9ZDZWsLNhjlrPys5rkSJhSVSr49s/7VY937N1+ETtP9c2O3YwCI xLi3sH9XVUhspXRyEmDY+Y4HLcuqTKze5neTD+0ZcW2dr4sHuOdIHfOCVYfUU3lQ bpB1bpAuH18g21V8x1XdLQnFg9QJ00OxyIPfXOyenNTmaZPbsoeGmd3x38TWhaH5 Iqr8s/bsTN7pZgF5MZ17qAu6GWeF6xePBtdPis6O7CRcAKNOChZXbTUuxtpAzws3 FnvwzErxJKqPShT0Ptp/MvgsViLVIkkGbQZJxnmo5Lv/hUtzIms4h4BbmUfU5q5f xg3Qs4mo2GUAMfdD9eIZw/Ajj7wh+rQytwgFb0mOP/ocA50GNCQeT0JRawTnfhLi 6OpNMCzja1OwOzpPpNYcMbuNh1dQ9sOy32B8E1exy/ak7i2WtoQHZvSasoAL7bKl q6AEgUtPMqKisDnJSlB8hFfvVYFcM0RDP5nVdooIRTZRYicGbjWUdYdQ1qOgFlfu St5gU/RxX7mqdhhS8V5e3kPb7XuyCj2itIf31etNE7RbSs+S57Awrtn8hDjmNX1D DZTUXDKUahuAGfZLDgM0 =Ui0U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yb1Y1aSXmXx6097B6Pq2-- --===============7917619850358961250== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLnhlbi5v cmcveGVuLWRldmVsCg== --===============7917619850358961250==--