From: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: sstabellini@kernel.org, wei.chen@arm.com, steve.capper@arm.com,
Kaly.Xin@arm.com, julien.grall@arm.com, nd@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] xen/arm: SMMU: Implement the add_device callback in SMMU
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:15:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498792511-25149-2-git-send-email-Wei.Chen@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1498792511-25149-1-git-send-email-Wei.Chen@arm.com>
This add_device callback function is taking care of adding a device
to SMMU and make sure it is fully prepare to be used by the SMMU
afterwards.
In previous code, we don't implement the add_device callback in
iommu_ops for ARM SMMU. We placed the work of add_device to
assign_device callback. The function assign_device should not care
about adding the device to an iommu_group. It might not even be
able to decide how to do that. In this patch, we move this work
back to add_device callback.
This add_device callback is only called while we are handling all
devices for constructing the Domain0.
Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>
---
xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c
index 74c09b0..2efa52d 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c
@@ -2591,6 +2591,26 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_iommu_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain)
xfree(domain);
}
+static int arm_smmu_xen_add_device(u8 devfn, struct device*dev)
+{
+ if (dt_device_is_protected(dev->of_node)) {
+ if (!dev->archdata.iommu) {
+ dev->archdata.iommu = xzalloc(struct arm_smmu_xen_device);
+ if (!dev->archdata.iommu)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ if (!dev_iommu_group(dev))
+ return arm_smmu_add_device(dev);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Return 0 if the device is not protected to follow the behavior
+ * of PCI add device.
+ */
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int arm_smmu_assign_dev(struct domain *d, u8 devfn,
struct device *dev, u32 flag)
{
@@ -2600,17 +2620,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_assign_dev(struct domain *d, u8 devfn,
xen_domain = dom_iommu(d)->arch.priv;
- if (!dev->archdata.iommu) {
- dev->archdata.iommu = xzalloc(struct arm_smmu_xen_device);
- if (!dev->archdata.iommu)
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
- if (!dev_iommu_group(dev)) {
- ret = arm_smmu_add_device(dev);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
+ if (!dev_iommu_group(dev))
+ return -ENODEV;
spin_lock(&xen_domain->lock);
@@ -2784,6 +2795,7 @@ static const struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_iommu_ops = {
.teardown = arm_smmu_iommu_domain_teardown,
.iotlb_flush = arm_smmu_iotlb_flush,
.iotlb_flush_all = arm_smmu_iotlb_flush_all,
+ .add_device = arm_smmu_xen_add_device,
.assign_device = arm_smmu_assign_dev,
.reassign_device = arm_smmu_reassign_dev,
.map_page = arm_smmu_map_page,
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-30 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 3:15 [PATCH 0/7] Generic IOMMU bindings support for Xen platform devices Wei Chen
2017-06-30 3:15 ` Wei Chen [this message]
2017-07-03 21:58 ` [PATCH 1/7] xen/arm: SMMU: Implement the add_device callback in SMMU Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-04 5:37 ` Wei Chen
2017-07-05 17:57 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-06 2:16 ` Wei Chen
2017-07-04 15:40 ` Julien Grall
2017-07-05 7:06 ` Wei Chen
2017-06-30 3:15 ` [PATCH 2/7] xen/arm: SMMU: Introduce a helper to add DT device to SMMU Wei Chen
2017-07-03 22:02 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-04 5:45 ` Wei Chen
2017-07-05 18:02 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-06 2:20 ` Wei Chen
2017-06-30 3:15 ` [PATCH 3/7] xen/arm: Prepare SMMU resources for protected devices Wei Chen
2017-07-03 22:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-30 3:15 ` [PATCH 4/7] xen/arm: SMMU: Detect types of device tree binding Wei Chen
2017-07-03 22:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-04 6:20 ` Wei Chen
2017-07-05 18:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-06 2:25 ` Wei Chen
2017-06-30 3:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] xen/arm: SMMU: Keep registering legacy master in SMMU probe Wei Chen
2017-07-03 22:32 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-30 3:15 ` [PATCH 6/7] xen/arm: SMMU: Support generic IOMMU bindings Wei Chen
2017-07-03 22:59 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-04 6:27 ` Wei Chen
2017-07-04 7:26 ` Julien Grall
2017-07-05 7:04 ` Wei Chen
2017-07-05 13:07 ` Julien Grall
2017-07-06 2:11 ` Wei Chen
2017-07-05 18:15 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-06 2:45 ` Wei Chen
2017-06-30 3:15 ` [PATCH 7/7] xen: Fix a typo in error message of iommu_do_dt_domctl Wei Chen
2017-07-03 21:53 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1498792511-25149-2-git-send-email-Wei.Chen@arm.com \
--to=wei.chen@arm.com \
--cc=Kaly.Xin@arm.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).