From: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
mengxu@cis.upenn.edu, jbeulich@suse.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: [PATCH v13 10/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos finding flow.
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:53:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499305996-19029-11-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499305996-19029-1-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
Continue from patch:
'x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: assemble features value array'
We can try to find if there is a COS ID on which all features' COS registers
values are same as the array assembled before.
Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
v13:
- remove unnecessary blank line.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
v12:
- use 'ARRAY_SIZE' to calculate array boundary.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- move same type variables declaration to one line.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- use 'ASSERT_UNREACHABLE()' to record bug and return error code if feat
exists but props does not exist.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- move 'i' definition into the loop to limit its scope.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
v11:
- move 'compare_val' implementation from CDP patch to this.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove 'rc' in 'compare_val' to make codes clearer.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- changes about 'feat_props'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- fix bug.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove unnecessary variable initialization.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove unnecessary comment.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- adjust array check place prior to using the array.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- add comment.
v10:
- remove 'compare_val' hook and its CAT implementation. Make its
functionality be generic in 'find_cos' flow.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- changes related to 'props'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- rename 'val_array' to 'val_ptr'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- rename 'find' to 'found'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- move some variables declaration and initialization into loop.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- adjust codes positions.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
v9:
- modify comments of 'compare_val' to be same as current implementation.
(suggested by Wei Liu)
- fix indentation issue.
(suggested by Wei Liu)
- rename 'l3_cat_compare_val' to 'cat_compare_val' to cover all L3/L2 CAT
features.
(suggested by Roger Pau)
- remove parameter 'found' from 'cat_compare_val' and modify the return
values to let caller know if the id is found or not.
(suggested by Roger Pau)
- replace feature list handling to feature array handling.
(suggested by Roger Pau)
- replace 'get_cos_num' to 'feat->cos_num'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- directly use 'cos_reg_val[0]' as default value.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- modify patch title to indicate 'L3 CAT'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- changes about 'uint64_t' to 'uint32_t'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
v5:
- modify commit message to provide exact patch name to continue from.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove 'get_cos_max_from_type' because it can be replaced by
'get_cos_max'.
- move type check out from callback functions to caller.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- modify variables names to make them better, e.g. 'feat_tmp' to 'feat'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- modify comments according to changes of codes.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
v4:
- create this patch to make codes easier to understand.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
---
xen/arch/x86/psr.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 100 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
index 84a8e30..306b02b 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
@@ -752,10 +752,110 @@ static int insert_val_into_array(uint32_t val[],
return -EINVAL;
}
+static int compare_val(const uint32_t val[],
+ const struct feat_node *feat,
+ const struct feat_props *props,
+ unsigned int cos)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for ( i = 0; i < props->cos_num; i++ )
+ {
+ uint32_t feat_val;
+
+ /* If cos is bigger than cos_max, we need compare default value. */
+ if ( cos > feat->cos_max )
+ {
+ /*
+ * COS ID 0 always stores the default value.
+ * For CDP:
+ * - DATA default value stored in cos_reg_val[0];
+ * - CODE default value stored in cos_reg_val[1].
+ */
+ feat_val = feat->cos_reg_val[i];
+
+ /*
+ * If cos is bigger than feature's cos_max, the val should be
+ * default value. Otherwise, it fails to find a COS ID. So we
+ * have to exit find flow.
+ */
+ if ( val[i] != feat_val )
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ feat_val = feat->cos_reg_val[cos * props->cos_num + i];
+ if ( val[i] != feat_val )
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
static int find_cos(const uint32_t val[], unsigned int array_len,
enum psr_feat_type feat_type,
const struct psr_socket_info *info)
{
+ unsigned int cos, cos_max;
+ const unsigned int *ref = info->cos_ref;
+ const struct feat_node *feat;
+
+ /* cos_max is the one of the feature which is being set. */
+ feat = info->features[feat_type];
+ if ( !feat )
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ cos_max = feat->cos_max;
+
+ for ( cos = 0; cos <= cos_max; cos++ )
+ {
+ const uint32_t *val_ptr = val;
+ unsigned int len = array_len, i;
+ int rc = 0;
+
+ if ( cos && !ref[cos] )
+ continue;
+
+ for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(info->features); i++ )
+ {
+ const struct feat_props *props = feat_props[i];
+
+ feat = info->features[i];
+ if ( !feat )
+ continue;
+
+ if ( !props )
+ {
+ ASSERT_UNREACHABLE();
+ return -ENOENT;
+ }
+
+ if ( len < props->cos_num )
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ /*
+ * Compare value according to feature array order.
+ * We must follow this order because value array is assembled
+ * as this order.
+ */
+ rc = compare_val(val_ptr, feat, props, cos);
+ if ( rc < 0 )
+ return rc;
+
+ /* If fail to match, go to next cos to compare. */
+ if ( !rc )
+ break;
+
+ len -= props->cos_num;
+ val_ptr += props->cos_num;
+ }
+
+ /* For this COS ID all entries in the values array do match. Use it. */
+ if ( rc )
+ return cos;
+ }
+
return -ENOENT;
}
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-06 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 1:52 [PATCH v13 00/23] Enable L2 Cache Allocation Technology & Refactor psr.c Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 01/23] docs: create Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) and Code and Data Prioritization (CDP) feature document Yi Sun
2017-07-07 16:37 ` Meng Xu
2017-07-10 5:25 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-10 13:09 ` Meng Xu
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 02/23] x86: move cpuid_count_leaf from cpuid.c to processor.h Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 03/23] x86: refactor psr: remove L3 CAT/CDP codes Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 04/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement main data structures, CPU init and free flows Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 05/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement Domain init/free and schedule flows Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 06/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 07/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 08/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement framework Yi Sun
2017-07-12 19:14 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 09/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: assemble features value array Yi Sun
2017-07-12 19:26 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-06 1:53 ` Yi Sun [this message]
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 11/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos id picking flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 12/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement write msr flow Yi Sun
2017-07-12 19:37 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 2:59 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-13 5:20 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 7:32 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-13 19:21 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-14 1:38 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 13/23] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement CPU init flow Yi Sun
2017-07-12 19:52 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 3:02 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-13 5:24 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 5:28 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 14/23] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 15/23] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement set value callback function Yi Sun
2017-07-12 20:01 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 16/23] x86: L2 CAT: implement CPU init flow Yi Sun
2017-07-12 20:09 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 3:03 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 17/23] x86: L2 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 18/23] x86: L2 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 19/23] x86: L2 CAT: implement set " Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 20/23] tools: L2 CAT: support get HW info for L2 CAT Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 21/23] tools: L2 CAT: support show cbm " Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 22/23] tools: L2 CAT: support set " Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 23/23] docs: add L2 CAT description in docs Yi Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1499305996-19029-11-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--to=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).