From: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
mengxu@cis.upenn.edu, jbeulich@suse.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: [PATCH v13 15/23] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement set value callback function.
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:53:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499305996-19029-16-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499305996-19029-1-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
This patch implements L3 CDP set value related callback function.
With this patch, 'psr-cat-cbm-set' command can work for L3 CDP.
Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
---
v13:
- remove 'strict' from 'psr_cbm_type_to_feat_type' because we use 'alt_type'
to check if we need set both DATA and CODE now.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- adjust the implementation in circle in 'insert_val_into_array' to make
codes clearer to show how to decide the return value.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
v12:
- add comment to explain how to deal with the case that user set new val
for both DATA and CODE at same time.
- add parameter for 'psr_cbm_type_to_feat_type' to return the feature type
according to it.
- use the feature type returned by 'psr_cbm_type_to_feat_type' to check
if we need insert the new value into all items of the feature value array.
- use conditional expression for wrmsrl.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
v11:
- move 'feat->cos_reg_val' assignment and value comparison in 'write_msr'
callback function out as generic codes.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- changes about setting both CDP DATA and CODE at same time.
- move 'type[]' declaration into previous patch which introduced 'cos_num'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- changes about 'type[]'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- move 'compare_val' to previous patch.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- changes about 'get_val' which has been replace by generic codes.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove 'restore_default_val' which is unnecessary now.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
v10:
- remove 'l3_cdp_get_old_val' and use 'l3_cdp_get_val' to replace it.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove 'l3_cdp_set_new_val'.
- modify 'insert_val_to_array' flow to handle multiple COSs case.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove 'l3_cdp_compare_val' and implement a generic function
'comapre_val'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove 'l3_cdp_fits_cos_max'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- introduce macro 'PSR_MAX_COS_NUM'.
- introduce a new member in 'feat_props', 'type[PSR_MAX_COS_NUM]' to record
all 'cbm_type' the feature has.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- modify 'gather_val_array' flow to handle multiple COSs case.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- modify 'find_cos' flow and implement 'compare_val' to handle multiple
COSs case.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- modify 'fits_cos_max' flow to handle multiple COSs case.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- changes about 'props'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove cast in 'l3_cdp_write_msr'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- implement 'compare_val' function to compare if feature values are what
we expect in finding flow.
- implement 'restore_default_val' function to restore feature's COS values
to default if the feature has multiple COSs. It is called when the COS
ID is reduced to 0.
v9:
- add comment to explain why CDP uses 2 COSs.
(suggested by Wei Liu)
- use 'cat_default_val'.
(suggested by Wei Liu)
- remove 'l3_cdp_get_cos_num' because we can directly get cos_num from
feat_node now.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove cos checking because it has been moved to common function.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- l3_cdp_set_new_val parameter 'm' is changed to 'new_val'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- directly use get_cdp_data(feat, 0) and get_cdp_code(feat, 0) to get
default value.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- modify 'l3_cdp_write_msr' flow to write value into register according
to input type.
- changes about 'uint64_t' to 'uint32_t'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
v8:
- modify 'l3_cdp_write_msr' type to 'void'.
v5:
- remove type check in callback function.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- modify return value of callback functions because we do not need them
to return number of entries the feature uses. In caller, we call
'get_cos_num' to get the number of entries the feature uses.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
- remove 'l3_cdp_get_cos_max_from_type'.
- rename 'l3_cdp_exceeds_cos_max' to 'l3_cdp_fits_cos_max'.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
v4:
- create this patch to make codes easier to understand.
(suggested by Jan Beulich)
---
xen/arch/x86/psr.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
index 46b8d32..e831165 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
@@ -373,12 +373,21 @@ static bool l3_cdp_get_feat_info(const struct feat_node *feat,
return true;
}
+static void l3_cdp_write_msr(unsigned int cos, uint32_t val, enum cbm_type type)
+{
+ wrmsrl(((type == PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA) ?
+ MSR_IA32_PSR_L3_MASK_DATA(cos) :
+ MSR_IA32_PSR_L3_MASK_CODE(cos)),
+ val);
+}
+
static const struct feat_props l3_cdp_props = {
.cos_num = 2,
.type[0] = PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA,
.type[1] = PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_CODE,
- .alt_type = FEAT_TYPE_L3_CAT,
+ .alt_type = PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3,
.get_feat_info = l3_cdp_get_feat_info,
+ .write_msr = l3_cdp_write_msr,
};
static void __init parse_psr_bool(char *s, char *value, char *feature,
@@ -824,17 +833,27 @@ static int insert_val_into_array(uint32_t val[],
if ( !psr_check_cbm(feat->cbm_len, new_val) )
return -EINVAL;
- /* Value setting position is same as feature array. */
+ /*
+ * Value setting position is same as feature array.
+ * For CDP, user may set both DATA and CODE to same value. For such case,
+ * user input 'PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3' as type. The alternative type of CDP is same
+ * as it. So we should set new_val to both of DATA and CODE under such case.
+ */
for ( i = 0; i < props->cos_num; i++ )
{
if ( type == props->type[i] )
{
val[i] = new_val;
- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
+ break;
}
+ else if ( type == props->alt_type )
+ val[i] = new_val;
+ else
+ ret = -EINVAL;
}
- return -EINVAL;
+ return ret;
}
static int compare_val(const uint32_t val[],
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-06 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 1:52 [PATCH v13 00/23] Enable L2 Cache Allocation Technology & Refactor psr.c Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 01/23] docs: create Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) and Code and Data Prioritization (CDP) feature document Yi Sun
2017-07-07 16:37 ` Meng Xu
2017-07-10 5:25 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-10 13:09 ` Meng Xu
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 02/23] x86: move cpuid_count_leaf from cpuid.c to processor.h Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 03/23] x86: refactor psr: remove L3 CAT/CDP codes Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 04/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement main data structures, CPU init and free flows Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 05/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement Domain init/free and schedule flows Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:52 ` [PATCH v13 06/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 07/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 08/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement framework Yi Sun
2017-07-12 19:14 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 09/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: assemble features value array Yi Sun
2017-07-12 19:26 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 10/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos finding flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 11/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos id picking flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 12/23] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement write msr flow Yi Sun
2017-07-12 19:37 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 2:59 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-13 5:20 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 7:32 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-13 19:21 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-14 1:38 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 13/23] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement CPU init flow Yi Sun
2017-07-12 19:52 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 3:02 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-13 5:24 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 5:28 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 14/23] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` Yi Sun [this message]
2017-07-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v13 15/23] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement set value callback function Jan Beulich
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 16/23] x86: L2 CAT: implement CPU init flow Yi Sun
2017-07-12 20:09 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 3:03 ` Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 17/23] x86: L2 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 18/23] x86: L2 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 19/23] x86: L2 CAT: implement set " Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 20/23] tools: L2 CAT: support get HW info for L2 CAT Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 21/23] tools: L2 CAT: support show cbm " Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 22/23] tools: L2 CAT: support set " Yi Sun
2017-07-06 1:53 ` [PATCH v13 23/23] docs: add L2 CAT description in docs Yi Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1499305996-19029-16-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--to=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).