xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>
To: "JBeulich@suse.com" <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"jun.nakajima@intel.com" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] vmx: add raw_vmx_msr_policy
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:29:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499333361.3082.4.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <595BBF25020000780016869A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 08:15 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 26.06.17 at 12:44, <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com> wrote:
> > 
> > @@ -611,6 +624,9 @@ int vmx_cpu_up(void)
> >  
> >      BUG_ON(!(read_cr4() & X86_CR4_VMXE));
> >  
> > +    if ( (rc = calculate_raw_policy(false)) != 0 )
> > +        return rc;
> > +
> >      /* 
> >       * Ensure the current processor operating mode meets 
> >       * the requred CRO fixed bits in VMX operation. 
> 
> Btw., is it intentional that the function is being invoked for the BSP a
> second time here (after start_vmx() did so already), with the flag
> now being passed with the wrong value?

Unfortunately, I couldn't find a better way of detecting if the code is running
on the boot CPU. And I decided to use the existing practice of passing a flag.

-- 
Thanks,
Sergey
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-06  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-26 10:44 [PATCH v1 0/6] VMX MSRs policy for Nested Virt: part 1 Sergey Dyasli
2017-06-26 10:44 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] vmx: add struct vmx_msr_policy Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-04 13:57   ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-06  9:21     ` Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-06  9:59       ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-05  3:02   ` Tian, Kevin
2017-06-26 10:44 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] vmx: add raw_vmx_msr_policy Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-04 14:15   ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-06  9:29     ` Sergey Dyasli [this message]
2017-07-06  9:45       ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-26 10:44 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] vmx: refactor vmx_init_vmcs_config() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-04 14:26   ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-05  3:21   ` Tian, Kevin
2017-06-26 10:44 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] vvmx: add hvm_max_vmx_msr_policy Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-04 15:04   ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-06 10:23     ` Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-06 12:28       ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-07 13:01         ` Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-07 14:01           ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-26 10:44 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] vvmx: add per domain vmx msr policy Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-04 15:09   ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-26 10:44 ` [DEBUG PATCH 6/6] vmx: print H/W VMX MSRs values during startup Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-05  2:52 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] VMX MSRs policy for Nested Virt: part 1 Tian, Kevin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1499333361.3082.4.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).